华南理工大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 77-90.doi: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.240331

• 智慧交通系统 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于模型预测控制的需求响应公交动态调度

靳文舟 张永 孙洁   

  1. 华南理工大学土木与交通学院,广东广州 510640

  • 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2024-12-06

Dynamic Scheduling of Demand Responsive Transit Based on Model Predictive Control

JIN Wenzhou ZHANG Yong SUN Jie   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,Guangdong,China
  • Online:2025-06-25 Published:2024-12-06

摘要:

需求响应公交作为共享公共交通新模式的典型代表,正面临着高效处理出行需求与实时规划车辆路径的挑战,传统的需求响应公交动态调度方法侧重于需求已知后对车辆路径的动态调整,这种方法往往难以全面适应出行需求的变化。因此,本研究通过引入模型预测控制方法,建立需求响应公交动态调度模型,利用未来阶段的先验客流信息为当前阶段的调度决策提供优化条件,并及时地根据系统最新披露的信息重新规划。算法上,本研究采用了自适应大领域搜索策略,通过两阶段启发式方法迭代车辆调度序列。数值实验结果显示,在无预测偏差的理想场景下,相较于传统动态调度方法,本研究方法能够显著降低系统总成本14.54%;即便在预测偏差为30%的悲观场景下,仍然能够实现5.27%的成本优化,并且各项乘客服务指标均表现出更优异的性能,验证了在不同随机环境下的普适性。

关键词: 交通运输工程, 需求响应公交, 动态调度, 模型预测控制, 自适应大领域搜索

Abstract:

As a typical representative of the new mode of shared public transport, demand responsive transit is facing the challenge of efficiently processing travel demand and real-time planning of vehicle routes. Traditional research on demand responsive transit dynamic scheduling mainly focuses on real-time adjustment of vehicle routes after dynamic demand is known, which often struggles to comprehensively adapt to changes in travel demands. Therefore, this study introduces model predictive control methods to establish a dynamic scheduling model for demand responsive transit, utilizing potential future-stage passenger flow information to optimize current-stage scheduling decisions and timely re-planning according to the latest disclosed information. In this study, an adaptive large neighborhood search strategy is adopted to optimize the iterative vehicle scheduling sequence through a two-stage heuristic method. Numerical experimental results demonstrate that in ideal scenarios without prediction deviation, compared to traditional dynamic scheduling methods, this study's approach significantly reduces the total cost of the system by 14.54%; even in a pessimistic scenario with a 30% prediction deviation, it still achieves a cost optimization of 5.27%. Moreover, various passenger service indicators exhibit superior performance, indicating strong universal applicability in different stochastic environments.

Key words: transportation engineering, demand responsive transit, dynamic scheduling, model predictive control, adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm