Thickness Distribution of Low Stress Three-Layer Bearing for Cam Lobe Hydraulic Motor

doi:10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.230413

Abstract

Abstract:

When the working speed of the low-speed high-torque cam lobe hydraulic motor is developing towards an extremely low speed (up to 0.2 r/min), one of its core friction pairs, the roller-piston pair, is difficult to establish a hydrodynamic lubricating oil film at low speeds, leading to wear fail of the friction pair. Therefore, a three-layer bearing bush structure of steel back-copper powder-self-lubricating material was usually arranged between the roller-piston pair to improve the lubrication ability of friction pair at low speed. However, the cam lobe motors usually need to withstand large loads, and how to design three-layer bearing with high bearing capacity has become a challenge in the design of cam lobe hydraulic motors. The thickness distribution of each layer of the three-layer bearing directly affects the maximum stress of the bearing under load, and then affects the bearing capacity and service life of the cam lobe hydraulic motor. In order to explore the effect of the thickness of each layer of the three-layer bearing bush on the overall bearing capacity of the bearing bush, this paper carried out the force analysis of the three-layer bearing bush, and obtained the mapping law between the thickness of the three-layer material and the maximum von Mises stress of the self-lubricating layer. And this paper also proposed a low-stress three-layer self-lubricating bearing bush thickness distribution scheme suitable for the roller-piston pair of cam lobe motors and designed a three-layer bearing thickness distribution scheme (the self-lubricating layer thickness was 0.2 mm, the copper powder layer thickness was 0.3 mm, and the steel back layer thickness was 1.0 mm) for an cam lobe hydraulic motor with a maximum working pressure of 31.5 MPa.The three-layer bearing using this scheme was installed on the hydraulic motor for motor performance testing. The test results show that the bearing capacity of the bearing under the thickness distribution can meet the requirements of the maximum working pressure of the cam lobe motor.

Key words: three-layer bearing, cam lobe hydraulic motor, thickness distribution, bearing capacity

CLC Number:

TH137

LI Ying, WANG Bozhong, HE Shuang, et al.. Thickness Distribution of Low Stress Three-Layer Bearing for Cam Lobe Hydraulic Motor[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 51(11): 93-100.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table1

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 4

Fig.9

References 17

1	李贝贝，魏令行，刘秀梅，等．基于虚拟双目视觉的锥阀振动测试［J］．华南理工大学学报（自然科学版），2022，50（10）：106-113.
	LI Beibei， WEI Lingxing， LIU Xiumei，et al ．Vibration testing of poppet valve based on virtual binocular vision［J］．Journal of South China University of Technology（Natural Science Edition），2022，50（10）：106-113.
2	张小龙，张军辉，方梓帆，等．内曲线径向柱塞马达滚柱-柱塞配合间隙优化［J］．华中科技大学学报（自然科学版），2021，49（8）：8-13.
	ZHANG Xiaolong， ZHANG Junhui， FANG Zifan，et al ．Optimization of roller-piston fitting clearance of cam lobe radial-piston motor［J］．Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology（Natural Science Edition），2021，49（8）： 8-13.
3	CHENG L， CHEN X， WEI G ．Cylinder fatigue design of low-speed，high-torque radial piston motor［J］．Coatings，2022，12（8）：1192/1-15.
4	王志强．内曲线式低速大扭矩水液压马达关键技术研究［D］．秦皇岛：燕山大学，2014.
5	马伟．多作用内曲线径向柱塞液压马达的动态特性与低速稳定性研究［D］．兰州：兰州理工大学，2022.
6	ISAKSSON P， NILSSON D， LARSSON R ．Elasto-hydrodynamic simulation of complex geometries in hydraulic motors［J］．Tribology International，2009，42（10）：1418-1423.
7	薛庆云．多种填料改性PTFE三层复合材料的性能研究［D］．杭州：浙江大学，2016.
8	LEWIS R ．Friction in a hydraulic motor piston/cam roller contact lined with PTFE impregnated cloth［J］．Wear，2009，266（7/8）：888-892.
9	ANDRADE T F， WIEBECK H， SINATORA A ．Effect of surface finishing on friction and wear of poly-ether-ether-ketone （PEEK） under oil lubrication［J］．Polímeros，2016，26：336-342.
10	LIN Zhibin， ZHANG Ke， YE Jiaxin，et al ．The effects of filler type on the friction and wear performance of PEEK and PTFE composites under hybrid wear conditions［J］．Wear，2022，490/491：204178/1-15.
11	HU K H， WANG J， SCHRAUBE S，et al ．Tribological properties of MoS₂ nano-balls as filler in polyoxymethylene-based composite layer of three-layer self-lubrication bearing materials［J］．Wear，2009，266（11/12）：1198-1207.
12	ZHANG X C， XU B S， WANG H D，et al ．An analytical model for predicting thermal residual stresses in multilayer coating systems［J］．Thin Solid Films，2005，488（1/2）：274-282.
13	丘佛球．机械压力机低速重载滑动轴瓦的受力分析［D］．广州：广东工业大学，2015.
14	陈凯航．钢板表面耐磨减磨铜/PTFE涂层的协调变形行为研究［D］．哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2021.
15	黄瑶．低速大扭矩水压马达受力分析与流场的数值模拟［D］．秦皇岛：燕山大学，2013.
16	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局，中国国家标准化管理委员会．塑料-青铜-钢背三层复合自润滑板材技术条件　第1部分：带改性聚四氟乙烯（PTFE）减摩层的板材［S］．北京：中国标准出版社，2012.
17	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局，中国国家标准化管理委员会．塑料-青铜-钢背三层复合自润滑板材技术条件　第2部分：带改性聚甲醛（POM）减摩层的板材［S］．北京：中国标准出版社，2012.

材料	密度/（kg·m^-3）	杨氏模量/GPa	泊松比
PEEK	1 300	3.64	0.4
CuSn8P	8 715	92.00	0.3
Q195	7 800	212.00	0.3
GCr15SiMn	7 900	214.00	0.3

网格尺寸/mm	最大等效应力/MPa	单元数
2.1	106.45	259 441
1.9	105.92	264 747
1.7	102.81	271 583
1.5	95.58	280 718
1.3	90.96	293 391
1.1	86.73	317 993
0.9	86.27	363 415

序号	厚度/mm
序号	自润滑层	铜粉层	钢背层
1	0.1	0.1	1.3
2	0.1	0.2	1.2
3	0.1	0.3	1.1
4	0.1	0.4	1.0
5	0.1	0.5	0.9
6	0.2	0.1	1.2
7	0.2	0.2	1.1
8	0.2	0.3	1.0
9	0.2	0.4	0.9
10	0.2	0.5	0.8
11	0.3	0.1	1.1
12	0.3	0.2	1.0
13	0.3	0.3	0.9
14	0.3	0.4	0.8
15	0.3	0.5	0.7
16	0.4	0.1	1.0
17	0.4	0.2	0.9
18	0.4	0.3	0.8
19	0.4	0.4	0.7
20	0.4	0.5	0.6
21	0.5	0.1	0.9
22	0.5	0.2	0.8
23	0.5	0.3	0.7
24	0.5	0.4	0.6
25	0.5	0.5	0.5

转速/（r·min^-1）	压力/MPa	流量/（L·min^-1）	容积效率/%
30.25	5.1	183.8	99.3
30.01	10.0	184.3	98.3
29.90	15.0	185.0	97.5
30.01	20.0	185.5	97.2
30.31	25.0	189.0	96.8
30.01	30.0	190.0	95.3
28.20	34.8	178.4	95.4

[1]	KANG Lan, CHEN Xuan, HONG Shutao. Axial Compression Behavior of Rectangular Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Columns Reinforced by Built-In Profiled Stirrup [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52(5): 101-113.
[2]	CHEN Zongping, QIN Weiheng, LIANG Yuhan, et al.. Test and Bearing Capacity Calculation Method of Concrete-Filled CFRP-Stainless Steel Sandwich Tube Columns Under Axial Compression [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52(1): 1-14.
[3]	JIANG Dongqi, WU Hao, FAN Jin. Study on Whole-Process Mechanical Behavior of Novel Spread Slab Beam Bridges [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52(1): 38-51.
[4]	KANG Lan, CHEN Zonglin, LIN Yiwei . Axial Compression Behavior of High-Strength Circular Steel Tube Confined High-Strength Steel Reinforced Concrete Short Columns [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 50(7): 1-12.
[5]	ZHENG Hongyu, YU Yuqi, XU Dixin, et al. Axial Compression Test of Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete Circular Column Inner-Confined by BFRP Spiral Strip [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 50(5): 96-108.
[6]	XIONG Ergang, ZU Kun, HU Qinbin, et al. Shear Capacity Prediction for RC Beams Without Stirrups Based on Mechanical Research [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 50(11): 115-124.
[7]	LING Yuhong, LIAO Haopeng, XU Jinghang, et al. Study on Mechanical Behavior of New Type Middle Joint of CFST Composite Column-Concrete Beam [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 50(11): 82-94.
[8]	MA Yudong, MA Kaize, WEI Hui, et al. Shear Behavior of Steel Fiber Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Deep Beams [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(4): 20-27,38.
[9]	TIAN Wenling, LI Xinbo, ZHOU Jian, et al. Compressive Performance of Brick Columns Strengthened with Textile Reinforced Concrete [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(9): 34-42,70.
[10]	ZHANG Yi LI Zhengliang LIU Hongjun LIU Shuyu . Study on the Stability Bearing Capacity of Unequal Angle Cross Bracing of Ultra-high Voltage Transmission Tower [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(7): 19-31.
[11]	YANG Lufeng HUANG Zilin XIE Weiwei. Homogeneous Generalized Yield Function and Ultimate Bearing Capacity Evaluation of Rectangular Steel Frame [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(3): 143-152.
[12]	DENG Wenqin ZHANG Jiandong ZHANG Hong ZHANG Yongtao . Mechanical Behavior of Segmental Precast Prestressed Composite Box Girder with Corrugated Steel Webs [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(7): 128-136.
[13]	HU Shi-xiang HUANG Qiao LIU Yi-he. Validation and Numerical Calculation of Ultimate Bending Bearing Capacity of Extra-Dosed Bridges [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44(8): 114-122.
[14]	HUANG Yuan ZHU Zheng-geng HUANG Deng YI Wei-jian ZHANG Rui. Investigation into Half Grout Sleeve Splicing for Rebars via Static Tensile Test [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44(2): 26-32.
[15]	Wu Li-li Liu Yan Jiang Yu-peng Zhang Dong-dong. Failure Modes Analysis of Steel Plate-Concrete Composite Slabs Under Transverse Concentrated Load [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 43(7): 68-74,99.