Architecture & Civil Engineering

Investigation on Acoustic Environment of Experimental Teaching Rooms in Universities

  • PENG Jianxin ,
  • WU Weizhen
Expand
  • 1.School of Physics and Optoelectronics,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,Guangdong,China
    2.Key Laboratory of Architectural Acoustic Environment of Anhui Higher Education Institutes,Hefei 230601,Anhui,China

Received date: 2025-04-01

  Online published: 2025-06-04

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(12574518);the Open Project of Key Laboratory of Architectural Acoustic Environment of Anhui Higher Education Institutes(AAE2023K01)

Abstract

Speech intelligibility is an important acoustic index for the acoustic environment quality in speech-oriented halls. Excessive reverberation time (RT) and high background noise levels (BNL) can significantly degrade speech intelligibility in rooms. While numerous studies have investigated the acoustic environments of university classrooms, research focusing on experimental teaching spaces remains relatively scarce. This study conducted objective acoustic measurements in 14 physics experimental teaching rooms at a university in Guangzhou, collecting room acoustic parameters including BNL, early decay time (EDT), RT, early-to-late sound energy ratio (C50), and speech transmission index (STI) to analyze the acoustic characteristics of such rooms. The results show that the average BNL in unoccupied experimental teaching rooms was 37.1 dBA, which increased to 57.9 dBA during student experiments. The average values of EDT, RT, C50, and STI across the measured rooms were 1.23 s, 1.26 s, -1.89 dB, and 0.54, respectively. Comparative test shows that under the same spatial dimension conditions, experimental teaching rooms exhibit shorter RT than conventional classrooms, with relatively flatter frequency characteristics. This study also found that large lab tables with cavities can help reduce RT in experimental teaching rooms and improve their RT frequency response. Further analyzed results show that 13 out of the 14 measured experimental teaching rooms failed to meet the recommended values specified in current relevant standards. It is recommended to implement appropriate acoustic treatments in these rooms to reduce RT and BNL, enhance room acoustic conditions and speech intelligibility, ensure compliance with the acoustic requirements for university experiment teaching, and facilitate effective verbal communication between instructors and students.

Cite this article

PENG Jianxin , WU Weizhen . Investigation on Acoustic Environment of Experimental Teaching Rooms in Universities[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science), 2026 , 54(2) : 145 -151 . DOI: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.250091

References

[1] ZHANG D, WONG L-T, MU K-W,et al .Acoustic comfort in educational buildings:an integrative review and new directions for future research[J].Building and Environment2024262:111849/1-12.
[2] VAN DEN HEUIJ K, GOVERTS T, NEIJENHUIS K,et al .Challenging listening environments in higher education:an analysis of academic classroom acoustics[J].Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education202113(4):1213-1226.
[3] PRODI N, VISENTIN C .A slight increase in reverberation time in the classroom affects performance and behavioral listening effort[J].Ear Hearing202243(2):460-476.
[4] MERCUGLIANO A, CORBANI A, BIGOZZI L,et al .The effects of classroom acoustic quality on student perception and wellbeing:a systematic review across educational levels[J].Frontiers in Psychology202516:1586997/1-12.
[5] LJUNG R, S?RQVIST P, KJELLBERG A,et al .Poor listening conditions impair memory for intelligible lectures:implications for acoustic classroom standards[J].Building Acoustics200916(3):257-265.
[6] HOFSTEIN A, LUNETTA V N .The laboratory in science education:foundation for the 21st century[J].Science Education200488:28-54.
[7] ALQAHTANI A Y, MAKKI A A, ALIDRISI H M .Revealing factors influencing classroom noise in the universities teaching and learning environment:a design of experiments approach[J].Journal of Engineering Research202311(1):100009/1-6.
[8] Acoustics— Measurement of room acoustic parameters— Part 2:Reverberation time in ordinary rooms: [S].
[9] BHANDARI N, TADEPALLI S, GOPALAKRISHNAN P .Investigation of acoustic comfort,productivity and engagement in naturally ventilated university classrooms:role of background noise and students’ noise sensitivity[J].Building and Environment2024249:111131/1-15.
[10] WANG J, SHI Q, ZHONG X .Effects of traffic noise on pupils’ behavior in classroom[J].ACTA Acustica199217(4):248-255.
[11] BRADLEY J S, BISTAFA S R .Relating speech intelligibility to useful-to-detrimental sound ratios[J].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2002112:27-29.
[12] Sound system equipment-Part 16:objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index: [S].
[13] LUZZI S, BUSA L .Acoustic design of the auditorium in the church of Rispescia[C]∥ Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration.Athens:IIAV,2016:1-6.
[14] LEE S-M, HAAN C-H .Determination of the sound absorption area inside an elementary classroom using three acoustical methods:computer modeling,1/10-scale model experiment,and field acoustic measurement[J].Buildings202414(1):222/1-20.
[15] 查雪琴,吕豪 .教室声学环境的分析及改善[J].声学技术202039(4):461-467.
  ZHA Xueqin, Hao LYU .Analysis and improvement of classroom acoustic environment[J].Technical Acoustics202039(4):461-467.
[16] 彭健新,王丹 .扩声系统对小学教室汉语语言清晰度的影响[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)201745(6):25-30.
  PENG Jianxin, WANG Dan .Effect of sound reinforcement system on Chinese speech intelligibility in primary school classrooms[J].Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition)201745(6):25-30.
Outlines

/