Mechanical Engineering

Non-Gaussian Modal Parameters Simulation Methods for Uncertainty Structures

  • PING Menghao ,
  • ZHANG Wenhua ,
  • TANG Liang
Expand
  • Institute of Technology,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China
平梦浩(1992—),男,博士,讲师,主要从事结构不确定性度量、贝叶斯估计方法等研究。E-mail: pingmenghao@bjfu.edu.cn

Received date: 2023-09-14

  Online published: 2024-01-26

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51975057)

Abstract

Structural uncertainty is commonly encountered in practical structural engineering problems. Considering the impact of uncertain factors on modal parameters is of significant importance in enhancing the robustness of structural dynamic analysis. In most developed methods involving the solution or estimation of random modal parameters for linear structures, the modal parameters are usually seen as Gaussian variables, and correlation among them is not getting much attention. However, the Gaussian and independence assumptions of the random mode parameters create simulation errors, affecting the robustness of the structural dynamics response predictions. To address this issue, this study proposed two approaches for simulating random modal parameters of respective discrete and continuous structures. For a discrete structure, its mode shapes are discrete. The random modal parameters are treated as correlated random variables. The correlated polynomial chaos expansion (c-PCE) method was applied to simulate non-Gaussianity and correlation based on the statistics of modal parameters. For continuous structures, random mode shapes are seen as correlated random fields. They can be represented in terms of correlated random variables by using the improved orthogonal series expansion method. Then they were combined with random natural frequencies to constitute a set of correlation variables, which are enabled to be simulated using standard Gaussian variables by utilizing the c-PCE. Finally, taking the truss structure and the plate structure respectively as examples, considering the non-Gaussianism of the modal parameters caused by the fluctuation of material parameters, the proposed random mode parameters can accurately simulate the statistical characteristics of the modal parameters, and further predict the random response of the structure. The simulation results verify the simulation accuracy of the proposed method for the random mode parameters and the necessity to consider the parameter correlations.

Cite this article

PING Menghao , ZHANG Wenhua , TANG Liang . Non-Gaussian Modal Parameters Simulation Methods for Uncertainty Structures[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science), 2024 , 52(9) : 81 -92 . DOI: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.230582

References

1 BATHE K J .Finite element procedures[M].Englewood Cliffs:Klaus-Jurgen Bathe,2006.
2 ALVIN K F, ROBERTSON A N, REICH G W,et al .Structural system identification:from reality to models[J].Computers & Structures200381(12):1149-1176.
3 YANG T, FAN S H, LIN C S .Joint stiffness identification using FRF measurements[J].Computers & Structures200381(28/29):2549-2556.
4 GOLLER B, BROGGI M, CALVI A,et al .A stochastic model updating technique for complex aerospace structures[J].Finite Elements in Analysis and Design201147(7):739-752.
5 YUEN K V, AU S K, BECK J L .Two-stage structural health monitoring approach for phase i benchmark studies[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE2004130(1):16-33.
6 LAM H F, YIN T .Statistical detection of multiple cracks on thin plates utilizing dynamic response[J].Engineering Structures201032(10):3145-3152.
7 ZHU H P, LI L, HE X Q .Damage detection method for shear buildings using the changes in the first mode shape slopes[J].Computers & Structures201189(9/10):733-743.
8 SINGH B N, YADAV D, IYENGAR N G R .Natural frequencies of composite plates with random material properties using higher-order shear deformation theory[J].International Journal of Mechanical Sciences200143(10):2193-2214.
9 LIN S C .The probabilistic approach for rotating Timoshenko beams[J].International Journal of Solids and Structures200138(40/41):7197-7213.
10 VAN DEN NIEUWENHOF B, COYETT J P .Modal approaches for the stochastic finite element analysis of structures with material and geometric uncertainties[J].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2003192(33/34):3705-3729.
11 GAO W, ZHANG N, JI J .A new method for random vibration analysis of stochastic truss structures[J].Finite Elements in Analysis and Design200945(3):190-199.
12 GAO W, ZHANG N, DAI J .A stochastic quarter-car model for dynamic analysis of vehicles with uncertain parameters[J].Vehicle System Dynamics200846(12):1159-1169.
13 PEETERS B, DE R G .Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis:a review[J].Journal of Dynamic Systems,Measurement and Control,2001123(4):659-667.
14 BRINCKER R, ZHANG L, ANDERSEN P .Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition[J].Smart Materials and Structures200110(3):441-445.
15 MAGALHAES F, CUNHA A .Explaining operational modal analysis with data from an arch bridge[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing201125(5):1431-1450.
16 AU S K .Fast bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain,Part I:posterior most probable value[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing201226(1):60-75.
17 AU S K .Fast bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain,Part II:posterior uncertainty[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing201226(1):76-90.
18 AU S K, ZHANG F L, NI Y C .Bayesian operational modal analysis:theory,computation,practice[J].Computers & Structures2013126(28):3-14.
19 BEHMANESH I, MOAVENI B, LOMBAERT G,et al .Hierarchical bayesian model updating for structural identification[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing2015(64/65):360-376.
20 VANIK M W, BECK J L, AU S K .Bayesian probabilistic approach to structural health monitoring[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics2000126(7):738-745.
21 YUEN K V, BECK J L, KATAFYGIOTIS L S .Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching[J].Structural Control & Health Monitoring201013(1):91-107.
22 SOHN H, LAW K H .A bayesian probabilistic approach for structure damage detection[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics201526(12):1259-1281.
23 SAKAMOTO S, GHANEM R .Polynomial chaos decomposition for the simulation of non-Gaussian nonstationary stochastic processes[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics2002128(2):190-201.
24 PING M.H, HAN X, JIANG C,et al .A time-variant uncertainty propagation analysis method based on a new technique for simulating non-Gaussian stochastic processes[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing2021150:107299.
25 XIONG F, Greene S, CHEN W,et al .A new sparse grid based method for uncertainty propagation[J].Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization201041(3):335-349.
26 JIA X Y, JIANG C, FU C M,et al .Uncertainty propagation analysis by an extended sparse grid technique[J].Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering201914(1):33-46.
27 WU J, ZHANG D, JIANG C,et al .On reliability analysis method through rotational sparse grid nodes[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing147:107106.
28 GAO W, CHEN J, CUI M,et al .Dynamic response analysis of linear stochastic truss structures under stationary random excitation[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration2005281(1/2):311-321.
29 XIU D, KARNIADAKIS G E .The wiener--askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations[J].SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing200224(2):619-644.
30 ZHANG J, ELLINGWOOD B .Orthogonal series expansions of random fields in reliability analysis[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics1994120(12):2660-2677.
31 YANG C, DURAISWAMI R, GUMEROV N A,et al .Improved fast gauss transform and efficient kernel density estimation[C]∥Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.[S.l.]:IEEE,2008.
32 KRISTAN M, LEONARDIS A, SKOCAJ D .Multivariate online kernel density estimation with Gaussian kernels[J].Pattern Recognition201144(10/11):2630-2642.
Outlines

/