华南理工大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 140-150.doi: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.240350

• 智慧交通系统 • 上一篇    

不同智能设备预测路面平整度的精度及其比较

张金喜 平馨颖 郭旺达 张宇轩   

  1. 北京工业大学 交通工程北京市重点实验室,北京 100124

  • 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2024-11-01

Accuracy and Its Comparison of Road Surface Roughness predicted by Different Intelligent Devices

ZHANG Jinxi PING Xinying GUO Wangda ZHANG Yuxuan   

  1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China
  • Online:2025-06-25 Published:2024-11-01

摘要:

在路面平整度预测达到规范化、标准化的同时,面向智慧城市、智能交通设施建设,路面平整度IRI的快速、高频次、低成本的智能预测也得到广泛的研究,但基于不同智能设备的平整度预测精度、预测效果等,尚未得到深入的研究。首先,本文利用作者课题组开发的两种智能预测设备,即路面行车数据采集智能手机App软件和路面行车数据采集智能终端,开展了路面行车实验,采集了行车振动、速度、位置等数据。通过引入随机森林模型,确定了最能够反映IRI影响的四个振动加速度特征指标。利用循环神经网络RNN、门控循环单元GRU和长短期记忆网络LSTM三种神经网络,建立了路面平整度IRI的预测模型,并对不同模型、不同设备的IRI预测精度进行了对比。结果表明:LSTM在三种神经网络模型中实现了最好的鲁棒性和最高的预测精度,两个智能设备预测IRI的R2分别为0.864、0.789,智能终端的预测精度要高于智能手机的预测精度。研究成果对于提升我国道路路面平整度预测和监测的信息化水平、提高道路养护决策科学化水平等,具有重要的理论意义和应用价值。

关键词: 道路路面, 智能终端, 智能手机APP, IRI, 行车振动, 特征指标, 预测精度

Abstract:

Even though the detection of road surface roughness has reached standardization, the rapid, high-frequency and low-cost intelligent detection method of IRI has also been widely studied for constructing the smart cities and the intelligent transportation facilities. However, the detection accuracy and detection effectiveness of IRI based on different intelligent devices have not been deeply studied. Firstly, this paper conducted road driving experiments using two intelligent IRI detection devices that was developed by the authors’ research group. One device is called driving data collection Smartphone APP, and another one is called road driving data collection Intelligent Terminal Device. The data of driving test vehicle, such as vibration acceleration, speed, GPS location and so on, was collected during the driving experiment, and four vibration acceleration indicators that can best reflect the impact of IRI were determined by using a random forest model. Next, three prediction models of IRI were established using three neural networks: recurrent neural network RNN, gated recurrent unit GRU, and long short-term memory network LSTM. The detection accuracy of IRI using different devices and different prediction models was compared. The results showed that, LSTM model achieved the best robustness and highest prediction accuracy among three neural network models. The R2 values of predicted IRI is 0.864 and 0.789 for the Intelligent Terminal Device and Smartphone APP respectively, which means that the detection accuracy of Intelligent Terminal Device was higher than that of Smartphone APP. The results of this paper have theoretical significance and application value for improving the informatization level of IRI detection and monitoring, as well as enhancing the scientific level of road maintenance decision-making.

Key words: road pavement, intelligent terminal device, smartphone APP, IRI, vehicle vibration, characterization index, predictive accuracy