华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)

• 交通运输工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

网联环境下基于动态分区的自动驾驶汽车协同避障方法

蒋贤才  孙嘉遥  张馨月   

  1. 东北林业大学 土木与交通学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040

  • 出版日期:2026-01-23 发布日期:2026-01-23

A Collaborative Obstacle Avoidance Method for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Dynamic Partitioning in a Connected Environment

JIANG Xiancai  SUN Jiayao  ZHANG Xinyue   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang,China

  • Online:2026-01-23 Published:2026-01-23

摘要:

既有自动驾驶车辆避障方法以安全为主,难以兼顾通行效率且易产生轨迹预测偏差。为此,以高速公路网联交通为背景,通过量化分级避障风险、设立避障影响区,构建以等效时间损失为统一度量的协同避障框架,基于三阶贝塞尔曲线提出安全与通行效率并重的自动驾驶汽车动态分区协同避障方法(DPCOM-AV),利用粒子群算法(PSO)对分区边界及避障轨迹控制点位置进行优化,借助模型预测控制(MPC)修正预测轨迹,以横向偏移度、纵向冲突及目标车道空间间隙为协同避障触发条件,以最大化利用道路时空资源。数值仿真表明,与静态障碍物场景相比,动态障碍物场景下的平均碰撞时间(TTC)和避免碰撞的减速度(DRAC)改善明显,动态障碍物场景下,DPCOM-AV较自动驾驶汽车风险感知的避障方法(MRP-AV)的TTC提升了23.3%、DRAC下降了15.28%;相较于自动驾驶车辆基于换道场景的分层避障方法(HOMLS-AV),DPCOM-AV增大了与障碍物的最小距离9.66%~23.03%、降低平均加加速度3.49%~11.58%,且有限时域碰撞风险概率显著下降。进一步分析表明,网联自动驾驶汽车(CAV)渗透率对DPCOM-AV的避障成效影响显著,CAV渗透率越高,协同避障的成效越显著。

关键词: 智能交通, 动态分区协同避障, 三阶贝塞尔曲线, 自动驾驶汽车, 网联交通

Abstract:

Existing obstacle avoidance methods for autonomous vehicles primarily focus on safety, often at the expense of traffic efficiency and with susceptibility to trajectory prediction errors. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a Dynamic Partitioned Cooperative Obstacle avoidance Method for Autonomous Vehicles (DPCOM-AV) in the context of expressway-connected traffic. A cooperative obstacle avoidance framework based on equivalent time loss is established by quantitatively grading obstacle risks and defining obstacle impact zones. Utilizing third-order Bézier curves, the method jointly addresses safety and traffic efficiency. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is applied to optimize partition boundaries and trajectory control points, while Model Predictive Control (MPC) corrects predicted trajectories. Collaborative avoidance is triggered by lateral offset, longitudinal conflict, and target lane gap to optimize the use of road spatiotemporal resources. Numerical simulations demonstrate that, in dynamic obstacle scenarios, DPCOM-AV significantly enhances safety indicators compared to static scenarios: the average Time-to-Collision (TTC) increases and the average Deceleration Required to Avoid Collision (DRAC) decreases. Specifically, relative to an Autonomous Vehicle Risk-Perception-based Obstacle Avoidance Method (OMRP-AV), DPCOM-AV improves TTC by 23.3% and reduces DRAC by 15.28%. Compared to a Hierarchical Obstacle Avoidance Method based on Lane-Change Scenarios (HOMLS-AV), DPCOM-AV increases the minimum distance to obstacles by 9.66%-23.03%, reduces average jerk by 3.49%-11.58%, and significantly lowers the probability of collision within a finite time horizon. Further analysis reveals that the penetration rate of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) markedly influences the effectiveness of DPCOM-AV, with higher CAV penetration leading to more substantial cooperative obstacle avoidance performance.

Key words: intelligent transportation, dynamic partition collaborative obstacle avoidance, third-order Bézier curve, autonomous vehicles, connected transportation