华南理工大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (12): 1-.doi: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.240503

• 智慧交通系统 •    

考虑驾驶人接受程度的信号交叉口车速二次引导策略

程国柱    史泽宇   

  1. 东北林业大学 土木与交通学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040

  • 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2025-08-15

Speed Secondary Guidance for Signalized Intersection Considering Driver Acceptance Level

CHENG Guozhu  SHI Zeyu   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China
  • Online:2025-12-25 Published:2025-08-15

摘要:

为了提高信号交叉口上游区域车辆通行效率并降低油耗及排放,本文提出一种考虑驾驶人接受程度的车速二次引导策略,旨在解决人工驾驶环境下驾驶人执行引导策略不充分的问题。研究以人工驾驶网联车辆为对象,引入驾驶人接受程度参数,改进了加速引导通过、减速引导通过及减速引导停车三种一次引导策略模型,考虑驾驶人接收程度低带来的影响,构建二次加速引导通过和二次减速引导通过模型。利用MATLAB仿真平台搭建仿真环境,考虑车辆运行轨迹、速度、加速度及油耗排放影响因素,对比分析无速度引导、不同驾驶人接受程度下一次引导及二次引导的效果。仿真结果表明:严格遵循一次引导策略可使更多车辆不停车通过交叉口,通行效率提升约14.3%,油耗与排放降低10%-15%;驾驶人接受程度较低对车速一次引导造成很大的负面影响,使一次引导策略失效,车辆产生额外油耗及排放;二次引导策略能够有效缓解驾驶人接受程度低的影响,使车辆通行效率恢复至一次引导的95%以上,油耗与排放减少约8%-12%。

关键词: 信号交叉口, 车速二次引导, 驾驶人接受程度, 车速引导模型, 仿真评价

Abstract:

To enhance the traffic efficiency of the upstream area of signalized intersections and reduce fuel consumption and emissions, this paper proposes a secondary speed guidance strategy considering the acceptance degree of drivers, aiming to address the issue of insufficient execution of guidance strategies by drivers in manual driving environments. The study focuses on manual driving connected vehicles, introduces the parameter of driver acceptance degree, and improves three primary guidance strategy models: acceleration guidance through, deceleration guidance through, and deceleration guidance to stop. Considering the impact of low driver acceptance, secondary acceleration guidance through and secondary deceleration guidance through models are constructed. A simulation environment is established using the MATLAB simulation platform, taking into account vehicle trajectory, speed, acceleration, and fuel consumption and emission factors. The effects of no speed guidance, primary guidance under different driver acceptance degrees, and secondary guidance are compared and analyzed. The simulation results show that strictly following the primary guidance strategy can enable more vehicles to pass through the intersection without stopping, improving traffic efficiency by approximately 14.3%, and reducing fuel consumption and emissions by 10% to 15%. Low driver acceptance has a significant negative impact on primary speed guidance, rendering the primary guidance strategy ineffective and causing additional fuel consumption and emissions. The secondary guidance strategy can effectively alleviate the impact of low driver acceptance, restoring traffic efficiency to over 95% of that of primary guidance and reducing fuel consumption and emissions by approximately 8% to 12%.

Key words: signalized intersection, speed secondary guidance, driver acceptance level, speed guidance model, simulation evaluation