Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science) >
Research Advances in Learning-Based Generative Methods for Interactive Scenarios of Autonomous Vehicles
Received date: 2025-06-30
Online published: 2025-10-09
Supported by
the National Key R & D Program of China(2024YFB2505704)
Interactive traffic scenarios, characterized by high-dimensional complexity and inherent risk, constitute a critical safety challenge in the testing and operation of autonomous vehicles (AVs). In recent years, learning-based generative method—exemplified by data generation, adversarial generation knowledge-driven generation, and large language models (LLMs)—has demonstrated significant advantages in improving the quality of interactive scenario generation and the efficiency of testing and validation, owing to their superior realism and coverage breadth. To systematically chart the advances, core techniques, and bottleneck issues in this domain, this paper presents a comprehensive review of learning-based generative methods for autonomous vehicle interactive scenarios, aiming to offer a clear technical roadmap and development direction for subsequent research. First, the fundamental attributes of interactive scenarios are outlined, and mainstream public datasets are comparatively analyzed to discuss their supportive role for learning-based generative methods. Concurrently, relevant standards, scenario description frameworks, and evaluation metrics for interaction are summarized, with an analysis of their impact on the expressive capacity of intertive behaviors. Second, the technical approaches and generation outcomes of various methods are categorized along two main directions: traditional learning-based methods and large language model-based me-thods. Finally, building upon existing findings, the article summarizes the current challenges faced by learning-based generative methods, both in terms of data and methodology, and proposes future research directions. The study finds that traditional learning-based methods face inherent challenges in balancing realism and diversity, as well as in the efficient discovery and generation of safety-critical scenarios. While LLM-based approaches show exceptional potential in semantic understanding and constructing complex logical narratives, they commonly encounter bottlenecks such as slow inference speeds, information hallucination, difficulties in aligning generated content with physical world constraints, and a lack of interpretability due to the “black-box” nature of their decision processes. Moreover, current research is still constrained by fundamental issues, including the scarcity of interaction-critical information in existing datasets and the absence of a unified metric for quantifying scenario criticality. This article concludes that although existing methods have achieved preliminary success in interaction modeling, significant improvements in generation quality and generalization capability are still required to meet the practical demands of autonomous vehicle development.
XIONG Lu , FENG Haojie , ZHANG Peizhi , TIAN Mengjie , ZHANG Xinrui . Research Advances in Learning-Based Generative Methods for Interactive Scenarios of Autonomous Vehicles[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science), 2026 , 54(3) : 31 -51 . DOI: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.250188
| [1] | 陈吉清，舒孝雄，兰凤崇，等 ．典型危险事故特征的自动驾驶测试场景构建［J］．华南理工大学学报（自然科学版），2021，49（5）：1-8. |
| CHEN Jiqing， SHU Xiaoxiong， LAN Fengchong，et al ．Construction of autonomous vehicles test scenarios with typical dangerous accident characteristics［J］．Journal of South China University of Technology （Natural Science Edition），2021，49（5）：1-8. | |
| [2] | 武彪，任洪泽，郑联庆，等 ．基于自然驾驶行为的智能驾驶复杂场景构建方法［J］．华南理工大学学报（自然科学版），2025，53（2）：38-47. |
| WU Biao， REN Hongze， ZHENG Lianqing，et al ．Com-plex scenario construction method for navigation pil ot based on natural driving behaviour［J］．Journal of South China University of Technology （Natural Science Edition），2025，53（2）：38-47. | |
| [3] | BROWN T， MANN B， RYDER N，et al ．Language models are few-shot learners［J］．Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems，2020，33：1877-1901. |
| [4] | WEI J， WANG X， SCHUURMANS D，et al ．Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models［J］．Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems，2022，35：24824-24837. |
| [5] | LEWIS P， PEREZ E， PIKTUS A，et al ．Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks［J］．Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems，2020，33：9459-9474. |
| [6] | HU E J， SHEN Y， WALLIS P，et al ．Lora： low-rank adaptation of large language models［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv： 2106.09685v2，2021. |
| [7] | PUNZO V， BORZACCHIELLO M T， CIUFFO B ．On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the next generation simulation （NGSIM） program data［J］．Transportation Research Part C：Emer-ging Technologies，2011，19（6）：1243-1262. |
| [8] | GEIGER A， LENZ P， URTASUN R ．Are we ready for autonomous driving？the kitti vision benchmark suite［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Providence：IEEE，2012，3354-3361 |
| [9] | BINAS J， NEIL D， LIU S C，et al ．DDD17：End-to-end DAVIS driving dataset［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2017. |
| [10] | KRAJEWSKI R， BOCK J， KLOEKER L，et al ．The highd dataset：a drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on german highways for validation of highly automated driving systems［C］∥Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems （ITSC）．Maui：IEEE，2018：2118-2125. |
| [11] | RAMANISHKA V， CHEN Y T， MISU T，et al ．Toward driving scene understanding： a dataset for learning driver behavior and causal reasoning［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Salt Lake City：IEEE，2018：7699-7707. |
| [12] | YU F， CHEN H， WANG X，et al ．Bdd100k：a diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Seattle： IEEE， 2020： 2636-2645. |
| [13] | HUANG X， WANG P， CHENG X ．The apolloscape open dataset for autonomous driving and its application［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops （CVPRW）．Salt Lake City：IEEE，2018：1067-1073. |
| [14] | HOUSTON J， ZUIDHOF G， BERGAMINI L， et al ．One thousand and one hours： self-driving motion prediction dataset［C］∥Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning．Cambridge：PMLR，2021： 409-418. |
| [15] | CHANG M F， LAMBERT J， SANGKLOY P， et al ．Argoverse： 3D tracking and forecasting with rich maps［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Long Beach： IEEE，2019： 8748-8757. |
| [16] | ZHAN W， SUN L， WANG D，et al ．Interaction dataset：an international， adversarial and cooperative motion dataset in interactive driving scenarios with semantic maps［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2019. |
| [17] | RASOULI A， KOTSERUBA I， KUNIC T， et al ．Pie： a large-scale dataset and models for pedestrian intention estimation and trajectory prediction［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision （ICCV）．Seoul：IEEE，2019 6262-6271. |
| [18] | PATIL A， MALLA S， GANG H， et al ．The H3D dataset for full-surround 3D multi-object detection and tracking in crowded urban scenes［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Robotics and Automation （ICRA）．Montreal：IEEE，2019 9552-9557. |
| [19] | IZQUIERDO R， QUINTANAR A， PARRA I， et al ．The prevention dataset： a novel benchmark for prediction of vehicles intentions［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference （ITSC）．Auckland： IEEE， 2019： 3114-3121. |
| [20] | PHAM Q H， SEVESTRE P， PAHWA R S， et al ．A* 3D dataset： towards autonomous driving in challenging environments［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation （ICRA）．Paris： IEEE， 2020： 2267-2273. |
| [21] | YANG G， SONG X， HUANG C，et al ．Drivingstereo：a large-scale dataset for stereo matching in autonomous driving scenarios［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Long Beach：IEEE，2019：899-908. |
| [22] | MALLA S， DARIUSH B， CHOI C ．Titan： future forecast using action priors［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Seattle： IEEE， 2020： 11186-11196. |
| [23] | BOCK J， KRAJEWSKI R， MOERS T， et al ．The ind dataset： a drone dataset of naturalistic road user trajectories at german intersections［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium （Ⅳ）．Las Vegas： IEEE， 2020： 1929-1934. |
| [24] | KRAJEWSKI R， MOERS T， BOCK J， et al ．The round dataset： a drone dataset of road user trajectories at roundabouts in germany［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems （ITSC）．Rhodes：IEEE，2020：1-6. |
| [25] | AGARWAL S， VORA A， PANDEY G， et al ．Ford multi-AV seasonal dataset［J］．The International Journal of Robotics Research，2020，39（12）：1367-1376. |
| [26] | BAO W， YU Q， KONG Y ．Uncertainty-based traffic accident anticipation with spatio-temporal relational learning［C］∥Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia．Seattle：ACM，2020：2682-2690. |
| [27] | CAESAR H， BANKITI V， LANG A H， et al ．Nuscenes： a multimodal dataset for autonomous driving［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Seattle：IEEE， 2020： 11621-11631. |
| [28] | KOTSERUBA I， RASOULI A， TSOTSOS J K ．Joint attention in autonomous driving （JAAD）［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2016. |
| [29] | YAO Y， WANG X， XU M， et al ．When，where，and what？ a new dataset for anomaly detection in driving videos［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2020. |
| [30] | LI S， QIAN Y， ZENG J， et al ．Analysis of the impact of large vehicles in merging areas based on driver characteristics under vehicle-road coordination［J］．Physica A： Statistical Mechanics and its Applications， 2025， 665： 130497/1-18. |
| [31] | MOERS T， VATER L， KRAJEWSKI R， et al ．The exiD dataset： a real-world trajectory dataset of highly interactive highway scenarios in Germany［C］∥Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium （Ⅳ）．Aachen： IEEE， 2022： 958-964. |
| [32] | LEVELXDATA ．The unid dataset ［EB/OL］．（2021-05-06） ［2025-06-01］．. |
| [33] | YOGAMANI S， HUGHES C， HORGAN J， et al ．Woodscape： a multi-task， multi-camera fisheye dataset for autonomous driving［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision．Seoul：IEEE，2019：9308-9318. |
| [34] | WILSON B， QI W， AGARWAL T，et al ．Argoverse 2：next generation datasets for self-driving perception and forecasting［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2023. |
| [35] | SUN P， KRETZSCHMAR H， DOTIWALLA X，et al ．Scalability in perception for autonomous driving：Waymo open dataset［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Seattle：IEEE，2020：2446-2454. |
| [36] | CAESAR H， KABZAN J， TAN K S，et al ．nuPlan：a closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehicles［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2021. |
| [37] | SINGH G， AKRIGG S， DI MAIO M，et al ．Road：the road event awareness dataset for autonomous driving［J］．IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence，2022，45（1）：1036-1054. |
| [38] | MAO J， NIU M， JIANG C，et al ．One million scenes for autonomous driving：ONCE dataset［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2021. |
| [39] | ZHENG O， ABDEL-ATY M， YUE L，et al ．CitySim：a drone-based vehicle trajectory dataset for safety-oriented research and digital twins［J］．Transportation Research Record，2024，2678（4）：606-621. |
| [40] | ZHANG Q， PENG Z， ZHOU B ．Learning to drive by watching youtube videos：action-conditioned contrastive policy pretraining［C］∥Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision．Tel Aviv：Springer Nature Switzerland，2022：111-128. |
| [41] | MALLA S， CHOI C， DWIVEDI I，et al ．Drama：joint risk localization and captioning in driving［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision．Waikoloa：IEEE，2023：1043-1052. |
| [42] | YU H， LUO Y， SHU M， et al ．Dair-v2x： a large-scale dataset for vehicle-infrastructure cooperative 3D object detection［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．New Orleans： IEEE， 2022： 21361-21370. |
| [43] | CREβ C， ZIMMER W， STRAND L， et al ．A9-dataset： multi-sensor infrastructure-based dataset for mobility research［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium （Ⅳ）．Aachen： IEEE，2022： 965-970. |
| [44] | GRESSENBUCH L， ESTERLE K， KESSLER T， et al ．Mona： the munich motion dataset of natural driving［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems （ITSC）．Macau： IEEE， 2022： 2093-2100. |
| [45] | XU Y， SHAO W， LI J， et al ．SIND： a drone dataset at signalized intersection in china［C］∥Procee-dings of the IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems （ITSC）．Macau：IEEE，2022： 2471-2478. |
| [46] | GENG M， LI J， XIA Y， et al ．A physics-informed transformer model for vehicle trajectory prediction on highways［J］．Transportation Research Part C：Emer-ging Technologies， 2023， 154： 104272/1-28. |
| [47] | AGARWAL N， CHEN Y T ．Ordered atomic activity for fine-grained interactive traffic scenario understanding［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision．Paris： IEEE， 2023：8590-8602. |
| [48] | ZIMMER W， CREβ C， NGUYEN H T， et al ．TUMTraf intersection dataset： all you need for urban 3D camera-lidar roadside perception［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems （ITSC）．Bilbao：IEEE，2023：1030-1037. |
| [49] | WANG J， FU T， SHANGGUAN Q ．Wide-area vehicle trajectory data based on advanced tracking and trajectory splicing technologies： potentials in transportation research［J］．Accident Analysis & Prevention，2023， 186： 107044/1-7. |
| [50] | CREβ C， ZIMMER W， PURSCHKE N， et al ．TUMTraf event： calibration and fusion resulting in a dataset for roadside event-based and RGB cameras［J］．IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles，2024，9（7）： 5186-5203. |
| [51] | ZIMMER W， WARDANA G A， SRITHARAN S，et al ．TUMTraf v2x cooperative perception dataset［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Seattle：IEEE，2024： 22668-22677. |
| [52] | JIANG X， ZHAO X， LIU Y， et al ．InterHub： a naturalistic trajectory dataset with dense interaction for autonomous driving［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv： 2411.18302， 2024. |
| [53] | WANG Y， CHENG K， HE J， et al ．DrivingDojo dataset：advancing interactive and knowledge-enriched driving world model［J］．Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems， 2024， 37： 13020-13034. |
| [54] | ZHU J， WANG W， ZHAO D ．A tempt to unify he-terogeneous driving databases using traffic primitives［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems （ITSC）．Maui： IEEE， 2018： 2052-2057. |
| [55] | ZHOU H， MA K， LIANG S， et al ．ULTra-AV： a unified longitudinal trajectory dataset for automated vehicle［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2024. |
| [56] | ZHOU X， LIN Z， SHAN X， et al ．DrivingGaussian：composite gaussian splatting for surrounding dynamic autonomous driving scenes［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Seattle：IEEE，2024：21634-21643. |
| [57] | 2022 Road vehicles—test scenarios for automated dri-ving systems—scenario-based safety evaluation framework： ［S］． |
| [58] | 2024 Road vehicles—test scenarios for automated dri-ving systems—scenario categorization： ［S］． |
| [59] | United Nations Economic Commission For Europe ．New assessment/test method for automated driving （NATM） guidelines for validating automated driving system （ADS）-amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2022/58 ［R］．Geneva： UNECE， 2022. |
| [60] | Standard for functional requirements of data for autonomous driving system testing：IEEE P3344 ［S］． |
| [61] | Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association，Inc ．Automated driving safety evaluation framework Ver 3.0 ［R］．Tokyo： Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association， Inc.， 2022. |
| [62] | 交通参与者行为理解与轨迹预测的评测方法及数据集构建标准：T/CAABZ2022002 ［S］． |
| [63] | 智能网联汽车 自动驾驶功能场地试验方法及要求： ［S］． |
| [64] | BERGER C， RUMPE B ．Engineering autonomous driving software［M］∥Proceedings of the Experience from the DARPA Urban Challenge．London：Springer，2012： 243-271. |
| [65] | ALTHOFF M， KOSCHI M， MANZINGER S ．CommonRoad： composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads［C］∥Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium （Ⅳ）．Los Angeles：IEEE，2017：719-726. |
| [66] | BOCK F， SIPPL C， HEINZ A， et al ．Advantageous usage of textual domain-specific languages for scenario-driven development of automated driving functions［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE International Systems Conference （SysCon）．Orlando：IEEE，2019：1-8. |
| [67] | QUEIROZ R， BERGER T， CZARNECKI K ．GeoScenario：an open DSL for autonomous driving scenario representation［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium （Ⅳ）．Paris：IEEE，2019：287-294. |
| [68] | Foretellix，Inc ．Measurable scenario description language［EB/OL］．（2021-05-06） ［2025-06-01］．. |
| [69] | FREMONT D J， KIM E， DREOSSI T，et al ．Scenic：a language for scenario specification and data generation［J］．Machine Learning，2023，112（10）：3805-3849. |
| [70] | ZHANG X， KHASTGIR S， JENNINGS P ．Scenario description language for automated driving systems： a two level abstraction approach［C］∥Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems，Man，and Cybernetics （SMC）．Toronto：IEEE，2020：973-980. |
| [71] | SCHüTT B， BRAUN T， OTTEN S， et al ．SceML： a graphical modeling framework for scenario-based testing of autonomous vehicles［C］∥Proceedings of the 23rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems．Montreal： ACM， 2020： 114-120. |
| [72] | ASAM.Openscenario［EB/OL］．（2021-05-09）［2025-06-01］．. |
| [73] | ZHOU Y， SUN Y， TANG Y，et al ．Avunit［EB/OL］．（2021-05-13）［2025-06-01］．. |
| [74] | CHEN B， LI T F ．Formal modeling and verification of autonomous driving scenario［C］∥Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Information Communication and Software Engineering （ICICSE）．Chongqing： IEEE， 2021： 313-321. |
| [75] | HARDER A， RANJIT J， BEHL M ．Scenario2Vector： scenario description language based embeddings for traffic situations［C］∥Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 12th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems．Nashville： ACM， 2021： 167-176. |
| [76] | LI B， DU D， CHEN S， et al ．SML4ADS： an open DSML for autonomous driving scenario representation and generation［C］∥Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering．Rochester： IEEE， 2022： 1-3. |
| [77] | KANG S， GUO H， SU P， et al ．Ecsas： exploring critical scenarios from action sequence in autonomous driving［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE 32nd Asian Test Symposium （ATS）．Beijing： IEEE， 2023： 1-6. |
| [78] | LI Q， PENG Z M， FENG L， et al ．Scenarionet： open-source platform for large-scale traffic scenario simulation and modeling［J］．Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems，2023，36：3894-3920. |
| [79] | AOKI T， TOMITA T， KAWAI T， et al ．Modeling language for scenario development of autonomous driving systems［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2025. |
| [80] | 凡海金，王润民，张心睿，等 ．无信号交叉口网联车辆协同碰撞预警研究进展［J］．汽车技术，2024（3）：1-16. |
| FAN Haijin， WANG Runmin， ZHANG Xinrui，et al ．Research progress of cooperative collision warning of connected vehicles at unsignalized intersections［J］．Au tomobile Technology，2024（3），1-16. | |
| [81] | DING W， XU C， ARIEF M， et al ．A survey on safety-critical driving scenario generation—a metho-dological perspective［J］．IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems， 2023， 24（7）： 6971-6988. |
| [82] | KAR A， PRAKASH A， LIU M Y，et al ．Meta-Sim：learning to generate synthetic datasets［C］∥Procee-dings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision．Seoul：IEEE，2019：4551-4560. |
| [83] | TAN S， WONG K， WANG S， et al ．SceneGen：learning to generate realistic traffic scenes［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Nashville：IEEE，2021： 892-901. |
| [84] | SUO S， REGALADO S， CASAS S，et al ．TrafficSim：learning to simulate realistic multi-agent behaviors［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition．Nashville：IEEE，2021：10395-10404. |
| [85] | CHEN J， YUAN B， TOMIZUKA M ．Deep imitation learning for autonomous driving in generic urban scenarios with enhanced safety［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems （IROS）．Macau：IEEE，2019：2884-2890. |
| [86] | DEVARANJAN J， KAR A， FIDLER S ．Meta-Sim2：unsupervised learning of scene structure for synthetic data generation［C］∥Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision．Glasgow：Springer International Publishing， 2020： 715-733. |
| [87] | ZHONG Z， REMPE D， XU D， et al ．Guided conditional diffusion for controllable traffic simulation［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation （ICRA）．London：IEEE，2023： 3560-3566. |
| [88] | SUN S， GU Z， SUN T， et al ．DriveSceneGen：generating diverse and realistic driving scenarios from scratch［J］．IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters，2024， 9（5）： 4552-4559. |
| [89] | YANG C， HE Y， TIAN A X， et al ．WcDT：world-centric diffusion transformer for traffic scene generation［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2024. |
| [90] | DING W， XU M， ZHAO D ．Cmts： a conditional multiple trajectory synthesizer for generating safety-critical driving scenarios［C］∥Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation （ICRA）．Paris：IEEE， 2020： 4314-4321. |
| [91] | KUUTTI S， FALLAH S， BOWDEN R ．Training adversarial agents to exploit weaknesses in deep control policies［C］∥Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation （ICRA）.Paris： IEEE， 2020： 108-114. |
| [92] | FENG S， YAN X， SUN H， et al ．Intelligent dri-ving intelligence test for autonomous vehicles with naturalistic and adversarial environment［J］．Nature Communications， 2021， 12（1）： 748/1-14. |
| [93] | SUN H， FENG S， YAN X， et al ．Corner case generation and analysis for safety assessment of autonomous vehicles［J］．Transportation Research Record，2021，2675（11）： 587-600. |
| [94] | MA Y， JIANG W， ZHANG L， et al ．Evolving testing scenario generation method and intelligence evaluation framework for automated vehicles［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2023. |
| [95] | WACHI A ．Failure-scenario maker for rule-based agent using multi-agent adversarial reinforcement learning and its application to autonomous driving［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2019. |
| [96] | CHEN B， CHEN X， WU Q， et al ．Adversarial evaluation of autonomous vehicles in lane-change scenarios［J］．IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems， 2021， 23（8）： 10333-10342. |
| [97] | HAO K， CUI W， LUO Y， et al ．Adversarial safety-critical scenario generation using naturalistic human driving priors［J］．IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles， 2023， 9（1）： 2788-2800. |
| [98] | DING W， CHEN B， XU M， et al ．Learning to collide： an adaptive safety-critical scenarios generating method［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems （IROS）．Las Vegas： IEEE， 2020： 2243-2250. |
| [99] | XU C， PETIUSHKO A， ZHAO D， et al ．Diffscene： diffusion-based safety-critical scenario generation for autonomous vehicles［C］∥Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence．Philadelphia：AAAI Press，2025：8797-8805. |
| [100] | LU J， AZAM S， ALCAN G， et al ．Data-driven diffusion models for enhancing safety in autonomous vehicle traffic simulations［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2024. |
| [101] | SHIROSHITA S， MARUYAMA S， NISHIYAMA D，et al ．Behaviorally diverse traffic simulation via reinforcement learning［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems （IROS）．Las Vegas：IEEE，2020：2103-2110. |
| [102] | RANA A， MALHI A ．Building safer autonomous agents by leveraging risky driving behavior knowledge［C］∥Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications， Computing， Cybersecurity， and Informatics （CCCI）．Beijing： IEEE， 2021： 1-6. |
| [103] | HAO K， LIU L， CUI W， et al ．Bridge Gen：Bridging data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches for safety-critical scenario generation in automated vehicle validation［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2023. |
| [104] | HUANG Z， ZHANG Z， VAIDYA A， et al ．Versatile behavior diffusion for generalized traffic agent simulation［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2024. |
| [105] | DING W， LIN H， LI B， et al ．Generalizing goal-conditioned reinforcement learning with variational causal reasoning［J］．Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems， 2022， 35： 26532-26548. |
| [106] | DING W， LIN H， LI B， et al ．CausalAF：causal autoregressive flow for safety-critical driving scenario generation［C］∥Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning．Atlanta： PMLR， 2023： 812-823. |
| [107] | DING W， LIN H， LI B， et al ．Semantically adversarial scene generation with explicit knowledge guidance［J］．IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems， 2025， 26（2）： 1510-1521. |
| [108] | TAN S， IVANOVIC B， WENG X， et al ．Language conditioned traffic generation［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2023. |
| [109] | LI S， AZFAR T， KE R ．ChatSUMO：Large language model for automating traffic scenario generation in simulation of urban mobility［J］．IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles，2024，9（1）：2801-2810. |
| [110] | AIERSILAN A ．Generating traffics scenarios via in-context learning to learn better motion planner［C］∥Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence．Philadelphia：AAAI Press，2025：14539-14547. |
| [111] | MICELI-BARONE A V， LASCARIDES A， INNES C. Dialogue-based generation of self-driving simulation scenarios using large language models［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2023. |
| [112] | CHANG C， WANG S， ZHANG J， et al ．LLMScenario： large language model driven scenario generation［J］．IEEE Transactions on Systems，Man，and Cybernetics：Systems，2024，54（11）：6581-6594. |
| [113] | XU W， PEI H， YANG J， et al ．Exploring critical testing scenarios for decision-making policies：an LLM approach［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2024. |
| [114] | DING W， CAO Y， ZHAO D，et al ．RealGen：retrieval augmented generation for controllable traffic scenarios［C］∥Proceedings of the European Confe-rence on Computer Vision. Milan：Springer Nature Switzerland， 2024： 93-110. |
| [115] | NGUYEN P， WANG T H， HONG Z W， et al ．Text-to-drive： diverse driving behavior synthesis via large language models［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems （IROS）．Abu Dhabi： IEEE，2024：10495-10502. |
| [116] | LU Q， WANG X， JIANG Y，et al ．Multimodal large language model driven scenario testing for autonomous vehicles［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2024. |
| [117] | ZHONG Z， REMPE D， CHEN Y， et al ．Language-guided traffic simulation via scene-level diffusion［C］∥Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning．Atlanta： PMLR， 2023： 144-177. |
| [118] | LIU Z， LI L， WANG Y， et al ．Controllable traffic simulation through LLM-guided hierarchical reasoning and refinement［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems（IROS）．Hangzhou：IEEE，2025：6288-6295. |
| [119] | ZHANG S， TIAN J， ZHU Z， et al ．DriveGen：towards infinite diverse traffic scenarios with large models［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2025. |
| [120] | HUANG H， CHEN Y， WANG Z， et al ．Chat-Scene： bridging 3D scene and large language models with object identifiers［C］∥Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver： NeurIPS Foundation， 2024：113991-114017. |
| [121] | LU Q， MA M， DAI X， et al ．Realistic corner case generation for autonomous vehicles with multimodal large language model［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2024. |
| [122] | TIAN X， GU J， LI B，et al ．DrivevLM：the convergence of autonomous driving and large vision-language models［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：，2024. |
| [123] | LI M， DING W， LIN H， et al ．CrashAgent：crash scenario generation via multi-modal reasoning［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2025. |
| [124] | MEI Y， NIE T， SUN J， et al ．LLM-attacker： enhancing closed-loop adversarial scenario generation for autonomous driving with large language models［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2025. |
| [125] | TANG S， ZHANG Z， ZHOU J， et al ．Legend： a top-down approach to scenario generation of autonomous driving systems assisted by large language models［C］∥Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering．Sacramento： ACM， 2024： 1497-1508. |
| [126] | TIAN H， REDDY K， FENG Y， et al ．Enhancing autonomous vehicle training with language model integration and critical scenario generation［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2024. |
| [127] | CUI Y， LIN H， YANG S， et al ．Chain-of-thought for autonomous driving： a comprehensive survey and future prospects［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2025. |
| [128] | ZHAO Y， ZHOU J， BI D， et al ．A survey on the application of large language models in scenario-based testing of automated driving systems［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2025. |
| [129] | CAI X， BAI X， CUI Z， et al ．Text2Scenario：text-driven scenario generation for autonomous driving test［J］．arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2025. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |