Skid Resistance Deterioration and Influencing Factors of Ultra-Thin Wear Layer

doi:10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.220806

Abstract

Abstract:

To accurately evaluate the decay process, mechanism and influencing factors of anti-sliding performance of asphalt ultra-thin wear layer after opening to traffic, this study first used arc mold and its supporting wheel grinding mechanism to prepare arc-shaped ultra-thin wear layer specimens. Then, it carried out the accelerated loading test of asphalt ultra-thin wear layer specimens with four gradation types and three asphalt binder grades by driving wheel accelerated loading system. Finally, it scanned the specimens after a certain number of wheel loads by laser texture scanner. Combined with the test data, the macro and micro structure depth decay models of asphalt ultra-thin wear layer based on S-type function were established respectively, and the independent and coupling effects of each porosity and asphalt binder on skid resistance were analyzed based on grey correlation analysis. The experimental results show that the driving wheel accelerated loading system combined with the S-type function model can quantitatively evaluate and predict the evolution process of the performance of the asphalt ultra-thin wear layer. The porosity affects the early decay rate of the macro and micro structural depth of the ultra-thin wear layer. The larger the porosity, the greater the early decay rate of the macro and micro structural depth of the ultra-thin wear layer. The middle and late decay rate of macro-structure depth is more affected by the grade of asphalt binder. The higher the performance grade of asphalt binder, the slower the decay rate of macrostructure depth in the middle and late stages. Void ratio and asphalt binder grade have similar influence on the decay rate of the micro-structure depth of the ultra-thin wear layer in the middle and late stage. Therefore, when designing the anti-sliding performance of the ultra-thin wear layer, it is beneficial to select the open-graded ultra-thin wear layer mixture with large porosity for the anti-sliding durability of the pavement, and the performance grade of asphalt binder can be reasonably selected according to the traffic volume.

Key words: ultra-thin wear layer, accelerated loading test, anti-sliding performance decay model, 3D laser texture scanning, macro-texture, micro-texture

CLC Number:

U414

WANG Duanyi, LI Yanbiao, PAN Yanzhu. Skid Resistance Deterioration and Influencing Factors of Ultra-Thin Wear Layer[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52(5): 1-9.

Figures/Tables 20

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Table 4

Table 5

Fig.15

References 22

1	虞将苗，杨倪坤，于华洋．道路高性能沥青超薄磨耗层技术研究与应用现状［J］．中南大学学报（自然科学版），2021，52（7）：2287-2298.
	YU Jiangmiao， YANG Nikun， YU Huayang ．Research and application status of high-performance asphalt ultra-thin wearing layer technology［J］．Journal of Central South University （Natural Science Edition），2021，52（7）：2287-2298.
2	《中国公路学报》编辑部．中国路面工程学术研究综述2020［J］．中国公路学报，2020，33（10）：1-66.
	China Journal of Highway and Transport. Review on china’s pavement engineering research 2020［J］．China Journal of Highway and Transport，2020，33（10）：1-66.
3	BELLANGER J， BROSSEAUD Y， GOURDON J ．Thinner and thinner asphalt layers for the maintenance of French roads［J］．Transportation Research Record：Journal of the Transportation Research Board，1992，1334：9-11.
4	KANDHAL P S， LOCKETT L ．Construction and performance of ultra-thin asphalt friction course［R］．Auburn：National Center for Asphalt Technology，1997：1-12.
5	JAHREN C T， BEHLING K R ．Thin maintenance surface treatments：comparative study［J］．Transportation Research Record：Journal of the Transportation Research Board，2004，1866（1）：20-27.
6	COOLEY L A J， JAMES R S， BUCHANAN S ．Development of mix design criteria for 4.75 mm superpave mixes［J］．Transportation Research Record：Journal of the Transportation Research Board，2003，1819（1）：125-133.
7	XIE H B， COOLEY L A J， HUNER M H ．4.75 mm NMAS stone matrix asphalt （SMA） mixtures［R］．Auburn：National Center for Asphalt Technology，2003：1-17.
8	彭华荣．超薄磨耗层NovaChip在广深高速公路的应用研究［D］．广州：华南理工大学，2011.
9	王勋，梁勇，陈搏，等．骨架约束作用对沥青磨耗层抗滑性能影响研究［J］．路基工程，2022，40（2）：56-62.
	WANG Xun， LIANG Yong， CHEN Bo，et al ．Research on the influence of skeleton constraint on the skid-resistance performance of asphalt wearing layer［J］．Subgrade Engineering，2022，40（2）：56-62.
10	关博文，薛兴杰，孟建党，等．SMA-5煅烧铝矾土超薄磨耗层路用性能与抗滑性能评价［J］．长安大学学报（自然科学版），2022，42（4）：10-19.
	GUAN Bo-wen， XUE Xing-jie， MENG Jian-dang，et al ．Evaluation of road performance and skid resistance of ultra-thin wear layer using calcined bauxite aggregate［J］．Journal of Chang’an University （Natural Science Edition），2022，42（4）：10-19．
11	ZONG Y J， LI S， ZHANG J B，et al ．Effect of aggregate type and polishing level on the long-term skid resistance of thin friction course［J］．Construction and Building Materials，2021，128：122730/1-10.
12	虞将苗，陈富达，彭馨彦，等．高韧超薄沥青磨耗层在港珠澳大桥珠海人工岛通道上的应用［J］．清华大学学报（自然科学版），2020，60（1）：48-56．
	YU Jiangmiao， CHEN Fuda， PENG Xinyan，et al ．Hight-toughness，ultra-thin friction course for the channel on the channel on the Zhuhai artificial island of the Hongkong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge［J］．Journal of Tsinghua University （Natural Science Edition），2020，60（1）：48-56．
13	陈富达．高韧超薄沥青磨耗层的力学性能和功能属性研究［D］．广州：华南理工大学，2020 .
14	黄卫东，张家伟，吕泉，等．基于间接拉伸开裂方法评价超薄磨耗层混合料抗裂性能［J］．同济大学学报（自然科学版），2020，48（11）：1588-1594.
	HUANG Weidong， ZHANG Jiawei， Quan LYU，et al ．Evaluation of cracking performance of ultra-thin friction course mixture based on indirect tensile asphalt cracking test［J］．Journal of Tongji University （Natural Science Edition），2020，48（11）：1588-1594.
15	公路沥青路面施工技术规范：［S］．
16	雷超旭．路面表面功能加速加载系统研究［D］．广州：华南理工大学，2010.
17	丁蓬勃．基于加速加载试验的高性能表面处治的研究［D］．广州：华南理工大学，2015.
18	陈玉宏，王金兵，杨航，等．正交异性钢桥面超薄铺装层加速加载试验研究［J］．公路，2021，66（6）：97-100.
	CHEN Yuhong， WANG Jinbing， YANG Hang，et al ．Experimental study on accelerated loading of ultra-thin paving layer of orthotropic steel bridge deck［J］．Highway，2021，66（6）：97-100.
19	AHAMME M A， TIGHE S L ．Pavement surface mixture，texture，and skid resistance：a factorial analysis［C］∥Proceedings of Airfield & Highway Pavements．［S.l.］：ASCE，2009：370-384．
20	梁遐意．低噪声功能路面表面纹理优化研究［D］．广州：华南理工大学，2020.
21	徐驰．湿热地区沥青路面抗滑性能衰减机理与改善措施研究［D］．广州：华南理工大学，2022.
22	谭学瑞，邓聚龙．灰色关联分析：多因素统计分析新方法［J］．统计研究，1995，12（3）：46-48.
	TAN Xuerui， DENG Julong ．Grey correlation analysis：a new method for multivariate statistical analysis ［J］．Statistical Research，1995，12（3）：46-48.

级配类型	各筛孔通过率/%									油石比/%	空隙率/%
级配类型	13.200	9.500	4.750	2.360	1.180	0.600	0.300	0.150	0.075	油石比/%	空隙率/%
SMA-10	100	99.2	48.6	28.5	22.3	18.2	14.2	12.1	10.4	6.5	4
AC-10	100	99.3	59.3	43.4	30.2	21.4	12.9	9.2	7.1	6.2	5
NovaChip B	100	98.8	31.5	25.8	18.5	13.6	8.9	6.8	5.5	5.2	13
OGFC-10	100	95.0	60.0	16.0	12.0	9.5	7.5	5.5	4.0	4.6	22

沥青	25 ℃针入度/0.1 mm	软化点/℃	5 ℃延度/cm	60 ℃动力黏度/（10⁴Pa·s）
PG76改性	55	89	31.2	2.5
PG88改性	50	95	28.0	35.0
PG94改性	46	98	24.0	58.0

试验项目	标准	检测结果
蒸发残留物/%	≥50	61.5
针入度/0.01 mm	40~120	56.0
软化点/℃	≥50	72.5
延度/cm	≥20	29.5

影响因素	F	P
沥青等级	426.039	0.000
空隙率	23 076.042	0.000
沥青等级*空隙率	15.513	0.010

影响因素	F	P
沥青等级	0.000	1.000
空隙率	17.046	0.010
沥青等级*空隙率	0.333	0.889