华南理工大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 131-136.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-565X.2014.04.020

• 汽车工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

非解耦式与解耦式电液复合制动系统及其评价

刘杨 孙泽昌 王猛 曾英捷   

  1. 同济大学 新能源汽车工程中心,上海 201804
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-24 修回日期:2013-12-23 出版日期:2014-04-25 发布日期:2014-03-03
  • 通信作者: 刘杨(1986-),男,博士生,主要从事电液复合制动技术和整车能耗分析研究. E-mail:021lytj@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘杨(1986-),男,博士生,主要从事电液复合制动技术和整车能耗分析研究.
  • 基金资助:

    国家 “973” 计划项目(2011CB711202)

Investigation and Evaluation of Coupled/Decoupled Electro- Hydraulic Braking System

Liu Yang Sun Ze- chang Wang Meng Zeng Ying- jie   

  1. Clean Energy Automotive Engineering Center,Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China
  • Received:2013-06-24 Revised:2013-12-23 Online:2014-04-25 Published:2014-03-03
  • Contact: 刘杨(1986-),男,博士生,主要从事电液复合制动技术和整车能耗分析研究. E-mail:021lytj@tongji.edu.cn
  • About author:刘杨(1986-),男,博士生,主要从事电液复合制动技术和整车能耗分析研究.
  • Supported by:

    国家 “973” 计划项目(2011CB711202)

摘要: 分析了电液复合制动系统的结构,对比了非解耦式和解耦式方案的优缺点; 研究了电液复合制动系统前、后轴制动力及再生制动力、液压制动力的分配策略,对比了3 种不同的协调控制方案.依据实车参数和测试数据,利用 Simulink- AMESim 建立了电液复合制动系统联合仿真模型; 定义了以回馈能量效率和司机驾驶解释一致性作为不同方案的量化对比评价指标.NEDC 和 SC03 循环工况结果表明,解耦式方案的回馈能量效率和司机驾驶解释一致性评价指标均优于非解耦式方案,两种工况下的回馈能量效率均高于50%.

关键词: 电动汽车, 解耦式方案, 电液复合制动系统, 回馈能量效率

Abstract:

In this paper,first,the structure of the electro- hydraulic braking system was analyzed,and the advanta-ges and disadvantages of coupled and decoupled schemes were respectively compared.Next,the distribution strate-gy of the braking force loaded on the front- rear axle,the regenerative braking force and the hydraulic braking forcewas investigated,and three coordinated control schemes were proposed and compared.Then,based on the vehicleparameters and the test data,a co- simulation model of the electro- hydraulic braking system was constructed withSimulink- AMESim.Moreover,two indexes,namely the regenerative energy efficiency and the estimated consis-tence with the driver's intention,were defined to evaluate the coordinated control schemes.Finally,a simulation ofthe schemes was carried out under NEDC and SC03 driving cycles.The results show that the decoupled brakingscheme is superior to the coupled one in terms of regenerative energy efficiency and estimated consistence,and thatit helps to achieve a regenerative energy efficiency of more than 50% under both NEDC and SC03 driving cycles.

Key words: electric vehicle, decoupled scheme, electro- hydraulic braking system, regenerative energy efficiency