华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)

• 能源、动力与电气工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

面向韧性提升的极端冰灾下输电网协同规划与运营策略研究

唐文虎1   余诣1   吴良峥1   余泽远2   陈华强1   

  1. 1.华南理工大学 电力学院,广东 广州 510640;

    2. 南方电网能源发展研究院有限责任公司,广东 广州 510663

  • 发布日期:2026-01-23

A Collaborative Planning and Operation Approach for Transmission Grids under Extreme Ice Hazards for Resilience Enhancement

TANG Whenhu1  YU Yi WU Liangzheng1  YU Zeyuan2  CHEN Huaqiang1   

  1. 1. School of Electric Power Engineering,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong,China;

    2. Energy Development Research Institute Co., Ltd.,CSG Guangzhou,Guangzhou 510663, Guangdong,China

  • Published:2026-01-23

摘要:

针对极端冰灾时空不确定性与输电网规划运营成本的矛盾,本文提出了一种面向韧性提升的输电网协同规划与运营策略研究。首先,在灾害建模层面,构建了融合广义极值分布(GEVD)与时空随机场的多阶段时空耦合覆冰模型,以捕捉灾害演化的非平稳特性;同时,采用连续时间马尔科夫链(CTMC)刻画多子导线的故障机理,描述覆冰增量下输电容量的变化过程。其次,在决策优化层面,构建了考虑条件风险价值(CVaR)的两阶段优化框架:第一阶段以最小化投资成本为目标,协同优化线路差异化抗冰等级与主动融冰装置布局;第二阶段以最小化运维成本与尾部风险为目标,对机组出力、分级负荷削减及融冰、除冰维修资源进行全过程协同调度。最后,基于改进IEEE RTS-96系统的算例分析表明:所提针对性投资策略相较于全线最高抗冰等级方案可节省约33%的投资成本;在运营阶段,通过多资源的时序接力配合,使单次极端灾害下的总运营成本降低74.9%。研究结果验证了该方法能有效实现输电网经济性与韧性的提升。

关键词: 极端冰灾, 电网韧性, 经济性评估, 连续时间马尔科夫链, 双协同优化

Abstract:

Addressing the conflict between the spatiotemporal uncertainty of extreme ice disasters and the economic constraints of transmission network hardening, this paper proposes a collaborative planning and operation method for enhancing grid resilience. First, regarding disaster modeling, a multi-stage dynamic icing model fusing Generalized Extreme Value Distribution (GEVD) and spatiotemporal random fields is constructed to capture the non-stationary evolution of disasters. Simultaneously, a Continuous-Time Markov Chain (CTMC) is employed to characterize the cascading failure mechanism of multi-split conductors, describing the dynamic decay of transmission capacity under ice accumulation. Second, regarding decision optimization, a two-stage stochastic optimization framework incorporating Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is proposed. The first stage (planning) co-optimizes differentiated line hardening levels and active de-icing device layout to minimize investment costs. The second stage (operation) minimizes operational costs and tail risks by coordinating generation redispatch, hierarchical load shedding, and active de-icing/repair resources. Case studies on a modified IEEE RTS-96 system demonstrate that the proposed targeted investment strategy saves approximately 33% of capital costs compared to a uniform maximum-hardening scheme. Furthermore, the multi-resource collaborative operation strategy reduces total operational costs by 74.9% under extreme scenarios. The research findings validate that this approach can effectively enhance the economic efficiency and resilience of transmission grids.

Key words: extreme ice disaster, grid resilience, economic assessment, continuous-time Markov chain, two-stage collaborative optimization