华南理工大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1-8,155.doi: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.180391

• 化学化工 •    下一篇

微细通道内表面活性剂对Al2O3/R141b流动沸腾传热影响

罗小平,彭子哲,李海燕   

  1. 华南理工大学
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-01 修回日期:2018-12-11 出版日期:2019-05-25 发布日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 罗小平 E-mail:mmxpluo@scut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目

Effect of Surfactant on Flow Boiling Heat Transfer of Al2O3/R141b in Microchannels

    

  1. 1.
    2. South China University of Technology
  • Received:2018-08-01 Revised:2018-12-11 Online:2019-05-25 Published:2019-04-01
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

摘要: 为了探究微细通道内表面活性剂对纳米流体制冷剂Al2O3/R141b流动沸腾传热的影响,采用二步法制备0.2wt%SDBS、0.3wt%SDBS、0.3wt%CTAB、0.4wt%CTAB、0.1wt%Span80、0.2wt%Span80改性纳米制冷剂与0.1wt%Al2O3/R141b纯纳米制冷剂7种实验工质。设计系统压力为170kPa、热流密度为9.4kW/m2~33.5kW/m2、质量流率为219.9kg/(m2?s)~439.8kg/(m2?s),在高、宽分别为2.0mm、1.0mm的矩形截面微细通道内进行基于表面活性剂改性纳米制冷剂流动沸腾传热实验。研究结果表明:表面活性剂对纳米制冷剂流动沸腾传热系数影响十分显著,添加0.2wt%、0.3wt%SDBS,0.3wt%、0.4wt%CTAB,0.1wt%、0.2wt%Span80表面活性剂纳米制冷剂饱和沸腾区平均传热系数较纯纳米制冷剂分别提升27.7%、17.9%、13.8%、8.9%、7.9%、5.3%。表面活性剂强化因子SEF随质量流率的增大而增大,在同一质量流率下SEF会随着热流密度的增大而减小,其中阴离子型表面活性剂SDBS对纳米流体流动沸腾传热效果最好,阳离子型表面活性剂CTAB次之,非离子型表面活性剂Span80最差

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of surfactants on the flow boiling heat transfer of nanofluids refrigerant Al2O3/R141b in microchannels, two-step process was used to prepare 0.2wt%SDBS, 0.3wt%SDBS, 0.3wt%CTAB, 0.4wt%CTAB, 0.1wt%Span80, 0.2wt%Span80 modified nano-refrigerant and 0.1wt%Al2O3/R141b pure nano- refrigerant. The flow boiling and heat transfer experiment of surfactant modified nanometer refrigerant was carried out in a rectangular microchannels with a height of 2.0mm and a width of 1.0mm respectively,and the design system pressure was 170kPa, the heat flux density was 9.4 kW/m2 to 33.5 kW/m2, and the mass flow rate was 219.9 kg/(m2?s)~439.8 kg/(m2?s). The results showed that the surfactant has significant effect on the flow boiling heat transfer coefficient of nano-refrigerant, the average heat transfer coefficient of the nano-refrigerant saturated boiling zone increased by 27.7%, 17.9%, 13.8%, 8.9%, 7.9%, and 5.3% when the surfactant was 0.2wt%SDBS, 0.3wt%SDBS, 0.3wt%CTAB, 0.4wt% CTAB, 0.1wt%Span80 and 0.2wt%Span80, respectively, compared with the pure nano-refrigerant. The smaller the agglomerated particle size of the surfactant-modified nano-refrigerant, the larger the heat transfer coefficient. The surface activity enhancement factor (SEF) increased with the increase of the mass flow rate, and the SEF decreased with the increase of the heat flux density at the same mass flow rate. The anionic surfactant SDBS has the best effect on the fluid boiling heat transfer of nanofluids, the cationic surfactant CTAB is the second, and the nonionic surfactant Span80 is the worst.

中图分类号: