土木建筑工程

圆弧角与粗糙条对CAARC风荷载影响研究

  • 杨易 ,
  • 吴健 ,
  • 王鑫 ,
  • 徐洲洋
展开
  • 1.华南理工大学 亚热带建筑与城市科学全国重点实验室,广东 广州 510640
    2.荔湾区建设工程质量监督站,广东 广州 510175
    3.宜昌市住房和城市更新局,湖北 宜昌 443000
杨易(1975—),男,博士,教授,主要从事风工程研究。E-mail: ctyangyi@scut.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-09-28

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-23

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(52178480);华南理工大学亚热带建筑与城市科学全国重点实验室项目(2024ZB10)

Study on the Influence of Rounded Corner and Rough Strips on Wind Load of CAARC Model

  • YANG Yi ,
  • WU Jian ,
  • WANG Xin ,
  • XU Zhouyang
Expand
  • 1.State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,Guangdong,China
    2.Liwan District Construction Engineering Quality Supervision Station,Guangzhou 510175,Guangdong,China
    3.Yichang Municipal Housing and Urban Renewal Bureau,Yichang 443000,Hubei,China
杨易(1975—),男,博士,教授,主要从事风工程研究。E-mail: ctyangyi@scut.edu.cn

Received date: 2024-09-28

  Online published: 2025-01-23

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52178480)

摘要

现代高层建筑表面常设有遮阳条、竖向装饰条等局部构件,建筑角区也通常采用圆弧化等设计措施。这些常见建筑设计特征对风荷载的影响不容忽略,而当前设计规范有待完善。以CAARC高层建筑标准模型为研究对象,通过刚性模型测压试验和高频天平测力试验,研究了建筑表面布置粗糙条和角区圆弧化共计7种工况对结构风荷载的影响。研究结果显示:光滑模型工况下,随圆角率由0增至10%,建筑迎风面角区极值负压绝对值会逐渐增加,最大增幅约为38.4%,而结构整体风荷载体型系数会逐渐减小,X向和Y向整体体型系数的最大减幅分别约为26.3%和39.9%;模型表面增设厚度为1.5 mm的竖向或网格粗糙条时,有利于减小结构角区及中部的极值负压绝对值,最大降幅为13.68%,对结构整体体型系数而言,粗糙条模型比直角光滑模型略有下降;布置竖向粗糙条和圆弧角对建筑角区表面风压的影响并不是一个简单的叠加关系,当同时布置竖向粗糙条和圆弧角时,角区的极值负压绝对值幅度增大,最大增幅为45.1%;布置粗糙条或角区圆弧化后,横风向功率谱峰值降低,功率谱峰值对应无量纲频率增大。

本文引用格式

杨易 , 吴健 , 王鑫 , 徐洲洋 . 圆弧角与粗糙条对CAARC风荷载影响研究[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2025 , 53(8) : 100 -110 . DOI: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.240485

Abstract

Modern high-rise building façades often feature local elements such as sunshades and vertical decorative strips, and corner areas of buildings commonly adopt design measures like rounding or curving. The influence of these common architectural design features on wind loads cannot be ignored, and the current code needs to be improved., This paper takestook the CAARC high-rise building standard model as the research object, and studied the influence of rough strips and rounded corner on the wind load of the structure through a series of rigid model pressure measurement wind tunnel tests and high-frequency balance force tests. The studies show that: 1) Under the smooth model condition, with the increase of rounding angle from 0% to 10%, the absolute value of the peak negative pressure in the corner area of the windward surface of the building will gradually increase, and with the maximum increase is of about 38.4%; The global body shape coefficients of the structure will gradually decrease, and the maximum reduction of the global body shape coefficients in the X direction and Y direction is about 26.3% and 39.9%, respectively. 2) Under the condition of arranging vertical or grid rough strips with a thickness of 1.5 mm on the surface of the model, it is beneficial to reduce the absolute value of the peak negative pressure in the corner and middle of the structure, with a maximum reduction of 13.68%; For the global body shape coefficients of the structure, the rough strip model is slightly lower than the smooth mode. 3) The influence of arranging rough strips and rounded corner on wind pressure of building corner areas is not a simple superposition relationship. When both rough strips and rounded corner are arranged, the absolute value of the peak negative pressure in the corner area increases, with a maximum increase of 45.1%. 4) After the installation of roughness elements or the rounding of corner areas, the peak value of the crosswind power spectrum decreases, and the dimensionless frequency corresponding to the spectral peak increases.

参考文献

[1] 建筑结构荷载规范: [S].
[2] 邹云峰,陈政清,牛华伟 .模型表面粗糙度对冷却塔风致响应及干扰的影响[J].空气动力学学报201432(3):388-394.
  ZOU Yunfeng, CHEN Zhengqing, NIU Huawei .Influence of model surface roughness on wind-induced response and interference of cooling tower[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica201432(3):388-394.
[3] 黄东梅,何世青,朱学,等 .表面粗糙度对超高层建筑风荷载与风振响应的影响[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版)201744(9):41-51.
  HUANG Dongmei, HE Shiqing, ZHU Xue,et al .Influence of surface roughness on wind load and wind-induced response of super-tall building[J].Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences)201744(9):41-51.
[4] STATHOPOULOS T, ZHU X .Wind pressures on buildings with mullions[J].Journal of Structural Engineering1990116(8):2272-2291.
[5] QUAN Y, HOU F, GU M .Effects of vertical ribs protruding from facades on the wind loads of super highrise buildings[J].Wind and Structures201724(2):145-169.
[6] YUAN K, HUI Y, CHEN Z .Effects of fa?ade appurtenances on the local pressure of high-rise building[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics2018178:26-37.
[7] 全涌,邱宏浩,张正维,等 .高层建筑水平悬挑遮阳板风荷载的风洞试验研究[J].建筑结构学报202243(3):92-97.
  QUAN Yong, QIU Honghao, ZHANG Zhengwei,et al .Wind tunnel test study on wind load of overhanging horizontal sunshade of hing-rise buildings[J].Journal of Building Structures202243(3):42-97.
[8] YANG Q, LIU Z, HUI Y,et al .Modification of aerodynamic force characteristics on high-rise buildings with arrangement of vertical plates[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics2020200:104155/1-18.
[9] CHEN F B, LIU H M, CHEN W,et al .Characterizing wind pressure on CAARC standard tall building with various fa?ade appurtenances:an experimental study[J].Journal of Building Engineering202259:105015/1-10.
[10] 庄翔,郑毅敏,郑晓芬,等 .不同圆角率下矩形高层建筑风荷载特性[J].建筑结构学报201839(S1):1-8.
  ZHUANG Xiang, ZHENG Yimin, ZHENG Xiaofen,et al .Wind load characteristics of rectangular high-rise buildings with various rounder corner ratios[J].Journal of Building Structures201839(S1):1-8.
[11] KAWAI H .Effect of corner modifications on aeroelastic instabilities of tall buildings[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics199874:719-729.
[12] TAMURA T, MIYAGI T, KITAGISHI T .Numerical prediction of unsteady pressures on a square cylinder with various corner shapes[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics199874:531-542.
[13] LI S, DENG Y, ZHONG Z,et al .Effects of corner modifications on wind-induced responses of super high-rise buildings by wind tunnel tests based on a novel low-damping elastic test model[J].Journal of Building Engineering202367:105881/1-15.
[14] 建筑工程风洞试验方法标准: [S].
[15] 王新荣,顾明,全涌 .圆角处理的断面宽厚比为2∶1的二维矩形柱体气动力系数的雷诺数效应研究[J].工程力学201633(1):64-71.
  WANG Xinrong, GU Ming, QUAN Yong .Experimental study of reynolds number effects on aerodynamic forces for 2∶1 rectangular prisms with various rounded corners[J].Engineering Mechanics201633(1):64-71.
[16] 杨群,于畅,刘小兵,等 .不同圆角率的方形断面斯特罗哈数的雷诺数效应研究[J].振动与冲击202342(11):223-231.
  YANG Qun, YU Chang, LIU Xiaobing,et al .Reynolds number effect of strouhal number of square prism with different rounded corner ratios[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock202342(11):223-231.
[17] 王怡静 .基于CAARC标准模型风洞试验的风场参数影响研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2020.
[18] 徐安 .超高层建筑结构风效应的现场实测与风洞试验研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2016.
[19] MARUTA E, KANDA M, SATO J .Effects on surface roughness for wind pressure on glass and cladding of buildings[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics199874:651-663.
[20] OKUDA Y, TANIIKE Y .Conical vortices over side face of a three-dimensional square prism[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics199350:163-172.
[21] 沈国辉,钱涛,罗蒋皓,等 .不同长宽比矩形截面高层建筑的风荷载研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版)201542(3):77-83.
  SHEN Guohui, QIAN Tao, LUO Jianghao,et al .Study of wind loading on rectangular high-rise buildings with various length-to-width ratios[J].Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences)201542(3):77-83.
文章导航

/