土木建筑工程

地震荷载作用下土工格室挡墙力学性能的影响因素

  • 靳飞飞 ,
  • 宋飞 ,
  • 石磊 ,
  • 朱婕
展开
  • 1.长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064
    2.长安大学 民航机场智慧建造与维养重点实验室,陕西 西安 710064
靳飞飞(1991—),男,博士生,主要从事边坡工程研究。

收稿日期: 2023-06-14

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52278328);中建新疆建工科技研发课题(65000022859700210197)

Influence Factors of Mechanical Properties of Geocell Retaining Wall Under Seismic Load

  • JIN Feifei ,
  • SONG Fei ,
  • SHI Lei ,
  • ZHU Jie
Expand
  • 1.School of Highway Engineering,Chang’an University,Xi’an 710064,Shaanxi,China
    2.The Key Laboratory of lntelligent Construction and Maintenance of CAAC,Chang’an University,Xi’an 710064,Shaanxi,China
靳飞飞(1991—),男,博士生,主要从事边坡工程研究。

Received date: 2023-06-14

  Online published: 2023-09-04

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52278328)

摘要

借助FLAC3D软件,建立土工格室柔性挡墙支护边坡数值模型,并采用振动台试验结果对数值模型进行验证,采用标定后的数值模型,系统研究了条带刚度、格室尺寸、挡墙厚度和充填料弹性模量4种因素对边坡动力响应的影响,并对挡墙的破坏机理进行了深入探讨,计算了各参数的影响权重。研究结果表明:地震作用下挡墙的稳定性与4种因素有着密切的联系;格室约束围压和永久水平位移沿高程分布规律基本一致,均表现为“增加-衰减”的两段形态,坡顶沉降自墙面向坡体延伸表现为两头小中间大的“V”型分布,水平峰值加速度沿高程表现为“增加-衰减-增加”的3段形态;随着刚度的增加,格室约束围压增大,而永久水平位移、坡顶沉降和水平峰值加速度均减小;随着格室尺寸的增加,格室约束围压、永久水平位移、坡顶沉降和水平峰值加速度均增加;随着挡墙厚度和充填料弹性模量的增加,格室约束围压、永久水平位移、坡顶沉降和水平峰值加速度均减小;4种影响因素中,格室尺寸影响权重最大,对格室约束围压的影响权重达到0.996,而挡墙厚度影响权重最小;地震作用下土工格室挡墙结构具有良好的抗震性能,挡墙结构对于地震能量具有一定的衰减作用,满足抗震设防要求。该研究结果对于地震作用下土工格室柔性挡墙的抗震设计及工程应用具有一定的指导作用。

本文引用格式

靳飞飞 , 宋飞 , 石磊 , 朱婕 . 地震荷载作用下土工格室挡墙力学性能的影响因素[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2024 , 52(7) : 145 -160 . DOI: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.230412

Abstract

This paper established a numerical model of geotechnical flexible retaining wall supporting slope with FLAC3D software, and the model was verified by the results of shaking table tests. With the calibrated numerical model, it systematically studied the influence of four factors on the dynamic response of slope, including strip stiffness, cell size, retaining wall thickness and filling elastic modulus. Additionally, it discussed the failure mechanism of the retaining wall and calculated the influence weights of each parameter. The results indicate that the stability of a retaining wall under earthquake action is closely related to these four factors. The distribution law of confining pressure and permanent horizontal displacement along elevation follows a two-stage pattern of “increase-attenuation”. Furthermore, settlement at the top of the slope presents a “V” shape distribution with smaller ends and larger middle portions. The horizontal peak acceleration exhibits a three-stage pattern of “increase-attenuation-increase” along elevation. With the increase of stiffness, the confining pressure of the cell increases, but the permanent horizontal displacement, slope roof settlement and horizontal peak acceleration decrease. With the increase of cell size, cell confining pressure, permanent horizontal displacement, slope top settlement and horizontal peak acceleration increase. With the increase of retaining wall thickness and filling elastic modulus, cell confining pressure, permanent horizontal displacement, slope top settlement and horizontal peak acceleration all decrease. Among the four influencing factors, the influence weight of cell size is the largest, and the influence weight on cell confining pressure is 0.996, while the influence weight of retaining wall thickness is the least. The retaining wall structure of geocele has good seismic performance under earthquake action, and the retaining wall structure has a certain attenuation effect on seismic energy, which can meet the requirements of seismic fortification. The research results provide guidance for the seismic design and engineering application of flexible retaining wall of geocell under earthquake action.

参考文献

1 赵飞,俞松波,李博,等 .地震作用下岩质边坡大型振动台试验研究进展[J].地球学报202247(12):4498-4512.
  ZHAO Fei, YU Songbo, LI Bo,et al .Research advances on large-scale shaking table test for rock slopes under earthquake[J].Earth Science202247(12):4498-4512.
2 LIN P, LIU X L, HU S Y,et al .Large deformation analysis of a high steep slope relating to the Laxiwa Reservoir,China[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering201649(6):2253-2276.
3 CHEN R H, CHIU Y M .Model tests of geocell retaining structures[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes200826(1):56-70.
4 SONG F, XIE Y L, YANG Y F,et al .Analysis of failure of flexible geocell-reinforced retaining walls in the centrifuge[J].Geosynthetics International201421(6):342-351.
5 宋飞,谢永利,杨晓华,等 .填土面作用荷载时土工格室柔性挡墙破坏模式研究[J].岩土工程学报201335(s1):152-155.
  SONG Fei, XIE Yong-li, YANG Xiao-hua,et al .Failure mode of geocell flexible retaining wall with surcharge acting on backfill surface[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering201335(s1):152-155.
6 SONG F, LIU H B, MA L Q,et al .Numerical analysis of geocell-reinforced retaining wall failure modes[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes201846(3):284-296.
7 NARIMAN K, GHAZAVI M .Static stability analysis of geocell-reinforced slopes[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes202149(3):852-863.
8 XIE Y L, YANG X H .Characteristics of a new-type geocell flexible retaining wall[J].Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering200921(4):171-175.
9 CHEN R H, WU C P, HUANG F C,et al .Numerical analysis of geocell-reinforced retaining structures[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes201339(8):51-62.
10 屈战辉,谢永利,袁福发,等 .土工格室柔性挡墙极限主动土压力计算方法[J].交通运输工程学报201010(1):24-28,35.
  QU Zhan-hui, XIE Yong-li, YUAN Fu-fa,et al .Calculation method of active earth pressure under limitstate for geocell flexible retaining wall[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering201010(1):24-28,35.
11 WANG J P .Large-scale shaking table tests of reinforced soil retaining walls with geocell facing[D].New York:Columbia University,2007
12 LING H I,DOV L, WANG J P,et al .Seismic response of geocell retaining walls:experimental studies[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering2009135(4):515-524.
13 SONG F, LIU H B, YANG B,et al .Large-scale triaxial compression tests of geocell-reinforced sand[J].Geosynthetics International201926(4):388-395.
14 蔡晓光,徐洪路,李思汉,等 .地震作用下返包式加筋土挡墙数值模拟[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版)202151(5):1416-1426.
  CAI Xiaoguang, XU Honglu, LI Sihan,et al .Numerical simulation of reinforced soil retaining wall with wrapped face under seismic effects[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition)202151(5):1416-1426.
15 蒋建清,杨果林 .格宾加筋土挡墙抗震性能及数值分析[J].土木工程学报201245(1):100-108.
  JIANG Jianqing, YANG Guolin .Numerical analysis of seismic behaviour of gabion-reinforced soil retaining wall[J].China Civil Engineering Journal201245(1):100-108.
16 LIU H B, YANG G Q, LING H I .Seismic response of multi-tiered reinforced soil retaining walls[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering201443(61/62):1-12.
17 UIJAWAL K N, VENKATESWARLU H, HEGDE A .Vibration isolation using 3D cellular confinement system:a numerical investigation[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering2019119(4):220-234.
18 左政,杨广庆,王贺,等 .土工格室规格对加筋土剪切性能的影响[J].岩土工程学报202244(6):1053-1060.
  ZUO Zheng, YANG Guang-qing, WANG He,et al .Effects of geocell size on shear behavior of reinforced soil[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering202244(6):1053-1060.
19 王涛,韩煊,赵先宇,等 .FLAC 3D数值模拟方法及工程应用[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015
20 宋丹青,黄进,刘晓丽 .地震作用下层状岩质边坡动力响应[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版)202148(5):113-120.
  SONG Danqing, HUANG Jin, LIU Xiaoli .Dynamic response of layered rock slopes under earthquakes[J].Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences)202148(5):113-120.
21 言志信,郭斌,段建 .黄土边坡地震动力响应探讨[C]∥第三届全国工程安全与防护学术会议论文集.武汉:中国岩石力学与工程学会,2012:373-378.
22 曾新吾,韩开锋 .弹性波动力学基础[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社,2012
23 张祖武,姚令侃 .土岩界面地震波能量传递与耗散特性研究——以汶川8.0级地震为例[J].灾害学201126(1):5-9.
  ZHANG Zuwu, YAO Lingkan .Seismic waves scattering in rock interface and energy dissipation characteristics-taking M8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake as an example[J].Journal of Catastrophology201126(1):5-9.
24 李昀,杨果林,林宇亮 .水平地震作用下加筋格宾挡土墙动力特性试验研究[J].岩土工程学报200931(12):1930-1935.
  LI Yun, YANG Guo-lin, LIN Yu-liang .Dynamic characteristics of reinforced gabion walls subjected to horizontal seismic loading[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering200931(12):1930-1935.
25 张江伟,李小军,齐剑峰,等 .地震动参数对土坡地震响应的影响权重研究[J].振动与冲击201837(6):225-230.
  ZHANG Jiangwei, LI Xiaojun, QI Jianfeng,et al .Effect of influence weights of ground motion parameters on soil slope seismic responses[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock201837(6):225-230.
文章导航

/