收稿日期: 2022-09-19
网络出版日期: 2023-01-19
基金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71734004)
Activity Resilience of Urban Residents: Empirical Evidence Based on the Recovery of Rail Transit Ridership During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Received date: 2022-09-19
Online published: 2023-01-19
Supported by
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(71734004)
居民活动韧性是社会韧性的重要体现。文中从社会韧性概念出发,定性验证新冠肺炎疫情期间居民活动韧性的存在性,定量分析其演进机制。首先,收集了我国境内28个城市在新冠肺炎疫情发生前后近两年的轨道交通逐日客流数据,定义并测度了居民活动韧性,引入逻辑函数对客流恢复过程进行建模分析;其次,从政策调整与行为适应角度建构并分析政府、公众等多元主体的行动调节和学习适应过程。结果显示,轨道交通网络规模越大的城市,居民活动韧性越高;相较于人口小于500万的城市,人口超过1 000万的超大城市工作日客流恢复到50%、80%、90%和100%水平的时间分别提前7、15、47和95 d,越到恢复后期二者差异越大,周末也呈现出相似的规律。同时,工作日刚性出行相比周末弹性出行具有更强的活动韧性,工作日和周末客流恢复的逻辑函数拟合参数α分别为0.019和0.016,H分别为77.07和106.82 d。在首轮疫情之后的疫情再爆发期间,轨道交通客流下降幅度减小,客流日均恢复率是首轮疫情时的1~3倍,居民活动韧性显著提升。研究认为,科学防控所塑造的公信力提升了公众对管控政策的遵守,公众对风险的认知和学习能显著改善活动韧性。文中研究结果为交通需求及居民活动恢复时间估计、社会管控政策影响评估提供了新的视角。
陈小鸿, 田田甜, 张华 . 城市居民活动韧性——新冠肺炎疫情期间轨道客流恢复的实证[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2023 , 51(7) : 109 -119 . DOI: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.220609
Urban residents’ activity resilience is a vital component of society resilience. Based on the concept of society resilience, this paper qualitatively verified the existence of urban residents’ activity resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, and quantitatively analyzed its evolution mechanism. Firstly, by using the daily rail transit ridership data of 28 cities in China in the two years before and after the outbreak of COVID-19, residents’ activity resilience was defined and measured, and a logistic function was introduced to model the ridership recovery process. Secondly, from the perspective of policy adjustment and behavior adaptation, this paper constructed and analyzed the action adjustment and learning adaptation process of plural subjects such as the government and the public. The results show that the larger the scale of rail transit network, the higher the residents’ activity resilience. As compared with the cities with a population of less than 5 million, the time for megacities with a population of more than 10 million to recover to 50%, 80%, 90% and 100% of the weekday ridership is 7 days, 15 days, 47 days and 95 days earlier, respectively. The later the recovery period, the greater the difference, and the weekend also shows a similar pattern. Rigid weekday activities have better resilience than flexible weekend activities, and the logistic function fitting parameters α of ridership recovery on weekdays and weekends are 0.019 and 0.016, respectively; H are 77.07 and 106.82 d, respectively. During the second outbreak after the first round of pandemic, the decline of rail transit ridership decreases, the average daily growth of ridership recovery rate in the second outbreak is 1~3 times that of the first round of pandemic, and residents’ activity resilience improves significantly. It concludes that the credibility created by accurate and effective interventions enhances the public compliance with policies, and that public awareness and learning about risks can significantly improve activity resilience. The research results provide a new perspective on how to estimate the travel demand and activity recovery and evaluate the impact of social interventions.
| 1 | ALEXANDER D E .Resilience and disaster risk reduction:an etymological journey[J].Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2013,13(11):2707-2716. |
| 2 | HOLLING C S .Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4(1):1-23. |
| 3 | JHA A K, MINER T W, STANTON-GEDDES Z .Building urban resilience:principles,tools,and practice[M].Washington D C:World Bank Publications,2013. |
| 4 | 王思斌 .社会韧性与经济韧性的关系及建构[J].探索与争鸣,2016,1(3):4-8. |
| WANG Sibin .Relationship and construction of social resilience and economic resilience[J].Exploration and Free Views,2016,1(3):4-8. | |
| 5 | SERAFIMOVA T .COVID-19:an opportunity to redesign mobility towards greater sustainability and resilience?[M].Florence:European University Institute,2020. |
| 6 | HALLEGATTE S, RENTSCHLER J, ROZENBERG J .Lifelines:the resilient infrastructure opportunity[M].Washington D C:World Bank Publications,2019. |
| 7 | ZHU Y, OZBAY K, XIE K,et al .Using big data to study resilience of taxi and subway trips for hurricanes Sandy and Irene[J].Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2016,2599(1):70-80. |
| 8 | HOSSEINI S, BARKER K .Modeling infrastructure resilience using Bayesian networks:a case study of inland waterway ports[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2016,93:252-266. |
| 9 | MIRZAEE S, WANG Q .Urban mobility and resilience:exploring Boston’s urban mobility network through twitter data[J].Applied Network Science,2020,5:1-20. |
| 10 | 叶建红,梁源,张宇飞,等 .重大突发公共卫生事件下交通运输应对策略——新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情的回顾性分析[J].城市交通,2020,18(3):71-79. |
| YE Jianhong, LIANG Yuan, ZHANG Yufei,et al .Transportation strategies under public health emergency:a review of COVID-19 pandemic[J].Urban Transport of China,2020,18(3):71-79. | |
| 11 | 罗炯,黄靖翔,周溶伟,等 .疫情下的地铁客流特征分析及管控——以深圳地铁为例[C]∥2020年中国城市交通规划年会论文集.北京:[出版者不详],2020. |
| 12 | 赵卫华 .新冠肺炎疫情之下居民“生活韧性”分析:一个理论框架及实证检验[J].江苏社会科学,2021(3):78-89. |
| ZHAO Weihua .Analysis of residents’“life resilience”under the COVID-19 pandemic:a theoretical framework and empirical test[J].Jiangsu Social Sciences,2021(3):78-89 | |
| 13 | ADGER W N .Social and ecological resilience:are they related?[J].Progress in Human Geography,2000,24(3):347-364. |
| 14 | WALKER B, HOLLING C S, CARPENTER S R,et al .Resilience,adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J].Ecology and Society,2004,9(2):5. |
| 15 | FERNáNDEZ-PRADOS J S, LOZANO-DíAZ A, MUYOR-RODRíGUEZ J .Factors explaining social resilience against COVID-19:the case of Spain[J].European Societies,2021,23(Sup1):S111-S121. |
| 16 | ALOI A, ALONSO B, BENAVENTE J,et al .Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on urban mobility:empirical evidence from the city of Santander (Spain)[J].Sustainability,2020,12(9):3870. |
| 17 | GAO J, WANG J, BIAN Z,et al .The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on transportation systems in New York City and Seattle,USA[EB/OL].(2020-05-03)[2022-11-06].. |
| 18 | EISENMANN C, NOBIS C, KOLAROVA V,et al .Transport mode use during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Germany:the car became more important,public transport lost ground[J].Transport Policy,2021,103:60-67. |
| 19 | TAN L, MA C .Choice behavior of commuters’ rail transit mode during the COVID-19 pandemic based on logistic model[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition),2021,8(2):186-195. |
| 20 | BRUNEAU M, CHANG S E, EGUCHI R T,et al .A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J].Earthquake Spectra,2003,19(4):733-752. |
| 21 | CONTRERAS D, BLASCHKE T, TIEDE D,et al .Monitoring recovery after earthquakes through the integration of remote sensing,GIS,and ground observations:the case of L’Aquila (Italy)[J].Cartography and Geographic Information Science,2016,43(2):115-133. |
| 22 | 李亚,翟国方 .我国城市灾害韧性评估及其提升策略研究[J].规划师,2017,33(8):5-11. |
| LI Ya, ZHAI Guofang .China’s urban disaster resilience evaluation and promotion[J].Planners,2017,33(8):5-11. | |
| 23 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会 .疫情通报[EB/OL].[2022-11-26].. |
| 24 | CHEN X, TIAN T, ZHANG H,et al .Recovery patterns and heterogeneity of rail transit under impact of COVID-19 pandemic[C]∥Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 101st Annual Meeting.Washington D C:Transportation Research Board,2022. |
| 25 | PARKER K, HOROWITZ J, MINKIN R .COVID-19 pandemic continues to reshape work in America[R].[S. l.]:[s. n.],2022. |
| 26 | 张品立,姚瑶 .疫情下的上海市公共交通及运行管理思考[J].交通与港航,2021,8(3):79-84. |
| ZHANG Pinli, YAO Yao .Study on the public transport and operation management in shanghai under the pandemic situation[J].Communication & Shipping,2021,8(3):79-84. | |
| 27 | 胡松,翁剑成,林鹏飞,等 .重大疫情对乘客公共交通依赖性的影响[J].交通信息与安全,2021,39(3):17-24. |
| HU Song, WENG Jiancheng, LIN Pengfei,et al .Impacts of major epidemic on passengers’ dependence on public transport[J].Journal of Transport Information and Safety,2021,39(3):17-24. | |
| 28 | 赵婉 .疫情防控常态化下市级政府应对突发公共卫生事件精准治理研究[D].太原:山西财经大学,2022. |
| 29 | 刘民,梁万年 .提升城市突发疫情防控能力——以首都新冠肺炎疫情防控为例[J].前线,2022(10):28-31. |
| LIU Min, LIANG Wannian .Improving the city’s ability to prevent and control sudden pandemic——taking the prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in the capital as an example[J].Qianxian,2022(10):28-31. | |
| 30 | 王新林 .大连市政府突发公共卫生事件应急处置能力研究[D].大连:东北财经大学,2021. |
| 31 | 汤龙 .大连疫情防控24小时[EB/OL].(2020-07-23)[2022-11-26].. |
| 32 | 张宇 .社会动员、政府公信力与政策遵从:风险社会韧性治理的合作逻辑[J].温州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,35(1):72-80. |
| ZHANG Yu .Social mobilization,government credibility and policy compliance:the cooperative logic of resilient governance in risk society[J].Journal of Wenzhou University (Social Science Edition),2022,35(1):72-80. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |