针对四面体及六传声器布置形式的声强阵列测试精度进行数值计算，比较了两
种阵列的幅值测量误差及方向判断误差，并通过消声室的测试分析验证数值计算结果． 研
究结果表明: 随着频率的升高，声强测量的幅值误差也相应增加; 声强阵列的半径小于 0．
012 7 m 时，频率为 6 kHz 时两者测量幅值误差均超过 2 dB． 在方向性误差判断方面，四传
声器比六传声器存在较大的优势． 在 kd( 波数与传声器声强阵列半径的积) 小于 1． 6 时，
四传声器声强阵列的方向误差判别小于 1°． 四传声器声强阵列降低了声强测量的硬件系
统要求，但在中频阶段完全可以用于相关的建筑声学测试．
In this paper，the measurement accuracies of the sound intensity arrays of the tetrahedral and six-microphone arrangements are numerically predicted，and the measured amplitude and angle biases of the two arrays are
compared． Then，the numerical results are verified by a test in an anechoic room． The results show that ( 1) the
measured amplitude errors of the two arrays increase with the frequency，and they are both greater than 2 dB when
the frequency is 6 kHz and the sound intensity array radius is less than 0. 012 7 m; ( 2) the tetrahedron is significantly superior to the six microphone in terms of the angle bias，and the angle bias of the tetrahedron is less than 1°
when kd ( the product of the wave number and the sound intensity array radius) is less than 1. 6; and ( 3) the tetrahedral sound intensity array reduces the requirement for the hardware system of the sound intensity measurement
and can be used in relevant architecture acoustical measurements at the intermediate frequency stage．
[1] GB/T 19889.3-2005 声学 建筑和建筑构件隔声测量 第3部分：建筑构件空气声隔声的实验室测量.
[2] GBT 19889.4-2005 声学 建筑和建筑构件隔声测量 第4部分：房间之间空气声隔声的现场测量.
[3] 黄险峰;;楼板隔绝撞击噪声的预测[J];噪声与振动控制;2008年04期.
[4] H. Suzuki, M. Anzai, S. Oguro and T. Ono, Performance evaluation of a three dimensional intensity probe, J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. (E), 16, (1995) 233–238.
[5] H. Suzuki, S. Oguro and T. Ono, A sensitivity correction method for a three-dimensional sound intensity probe, Acoust. Sci. & Tech., 21, (2000) 259–265.
[6] R. Hicklingand A.W. Brown，Determining the direction to a sound source in air using vector sound-intensity probes, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129 , ( 2011）219-224.
[7] Finn Jacobsen, A comparison of two different sound intensity measurement principles. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 , (2005) 1510–1517
[8] Basten, T. G.de Bree, H. E, Full bandwidth calibration procedure for acoustic probes containing a pressure and particle velocity sensor, J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, (2010) 264-270.
[9] H.-E. de Bree, ‘The Microflown: An acoustic particle velocity sensor’, Acoustics Australia 31, (2003) 91-94.
[10] Curtis P. Wiederhold,Kent L. Gee, Jonathan D. Blotter, Comparison of multimicrophone probe design and processing methods in measuring acoustic intensity. J Acoust Soc Am. 135(2014 )2797-2807.
[11] Michael B. Muhlestein, Derek C. Thomas, and Kent L. Gee, Time-domain effects of rigid sphere scattering on measurement of transient plane waves, J Acoust Soc Am. 136(2014) 13-21.
[12] Takeshi Iino, Hirokazu Tatekawa, Hisanobu Mizukawa and Hideo Suzuki, Numerical evaluation of three-dimensional sound intensity measurement accuracies and a proposal for an error correction method, Acoust. Sci. & Tech. 34, 1 (2013) 34-41.
[13] Khalid H. Miah and Elmer L. Hixon, Design and performance evaluation of a broadband three dimensional acoustic intensity measuring system, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127(2010) 2338-2346.
[14] Earl G. Williams, Kazuhiro Takashima, Vector intensity reconstructions in a volume surrounding a rigid spherical microphone array, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127(2010) 773-783.
[15] Jean-Claude Pascal, Jing-Fang Lib, A systematic method to obtain 3D finite-difference formulations for acoustic intensity and other energy quantities, Journal of Sound and Vibration 310 (2008) 1093–1111.
[16] Finn Jacobsen, An Overview of the Sources of Error in Sound Power Determination Using the Intensity Technique, Applied Acoustics,50 (1997)155-166.
[17] Frbdbric Laville and Jean Nicolas , A computer simulation of sound power determination using two-microphone sound intensity measurements, J Acoust Soc Am. 91(1992)2042-2055.
[18] J. Y. Chung, “Cross-spectral method of measuring acoustic intensity with-out error caused by instrument phase mismatch,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64（1978）1613–1616.
[19] G. Rasmussen, Measurement of vector fields, Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Acoustic Intensity, Senlis, France (1985), 53-58.
