华南理工大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 30-35.

• 土木建筑工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂地形风能评估的CFD方法

肖仪清1  李朝1  欧进萍1  宋丽莉2  李秋胜3   

  1. 1. 哈尔滨工业大学 深圳研究生院, 广东 深圳 518055; 2. 广东省 气候与农业气象中心, 广东 广州 510080; 3. 香港城市大学 建筑系, 香港 九龙
  • 收稿日期:2009-01-04 修回日期:2009-06-05 出版日期:2009-09-25 发布日期:2009-09-25
  • 通信作者: 肖仪清(1973-),男,博士,教授,主要从事风工程、结构安全评定与健康监测研究. E-mail:xiaoyq@hit.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:肖仪清(1973-),男,博士,教授,主要从事风工程、结构安全评定与健康监测研究.
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(50778059)

CFD Approach to Evaluation of Wind Energy in Complex Terrain

Xiao Yi-qing Li Chao Ou Jin-ping1  Song Li-li2  Li Qiu-sheng3   

  1. 1. Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China; 2. Guangdong Climatic and Agrometeorological Center, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Department of Building and Construction, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
  • Received:2009-01-04 Revised:2009-06-05 Online:2009-09-25 Published:2009-09-25
  • Contact: 肖仪清(1973-),男,博士,教授,主要从事风工程、结构安全评定与健康监测研究. E-mail:xiaoyq@hit.edu.cn
  • About author:肖仪清(1973-),男,博士,教授,主要从事风工程、结构安全评定与健康监测研究.
  • Supported by:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(50778059)

摘要: 为解决传统方法不能评估复杂地形风能分布的问题,从某复杂地形的实测记录中选定两次风向稳定的强风过程为研究工况,建立了该地形40m×40m和20m×20m两种网格分辨率的六面体结构网格模型,采用SSTk-ω及RNGk-ε两种湍流模型模拟了风速场分布.157°和83°两个风向的模拟结果表明,SSTk-ω模型优于RNGk-ε模型,20m水平间距的网格精度更高,其中SST(20m)的模拟结果和实测风速的平均相对误差分别为6.46%和5.50%.最后,综合CFD模拟的风速比分布与当地的常年气象资料,提出了复杂地形全风向风能评估方法.

关键词: 复杂地形, 计算流体力学, 现场实测, 风能评估, 微观选址

Abstract:

To evaluate the wind energy distribution in a complex terrain which is impossible to be done by using traditional methods,two strong wind events with stable wind direction were selected from the field record of a real complex terrain and were used as the researching objects.Then,the wind field in the terrain was meshed into hexahedral grids with two resolutions of 40m×40m and 20m×20m,and two turbulence models,namely SST k-ω and RNG k-ε,were adopted to simulate the wind speed field distribution.The simulation results of the wind indicate that SST k-ω model is superior to RNG k-ω model because it is of higher accuracy of the grid with a horizontal space of 20 m, and that, in the case of SST(20 m) , the mean relative errors between the simulated and the measured wind speeds in 157° and 83° directions are respectively 6.46% and 5.50%. The authors also proposed a fulldirection wind energy evaluation method applicable to complex terrains, which takes into consideration both the wind speeding ratio distribution obtained from CFD simulation and the local normal meteorological data.

Key words: complex terrain, computational fluid dynamics, field measurement, wind energy evaluation, micro-siting