华南理工大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (12): 89-100.doi: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.200736

所属专题: 2021年交通运输工程

• 交通运输工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

黏滞阻尼器与钢阻尼器在桥梁横向震动控制中的应用研究

郑一峰 钱盛域   

  1. 吉林大学  建设工程学院,吉林  长春  130012
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-02 修回日期:2021-05-25 出版日期:2021-12-25 发布日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 郑一峰(1966-),男,教授,主要从事桥梁抗震研究。 E-mail:zhengyf0824@126.com
  • 作者简介:郑一峰(1966-),男,教授,主要从事桥梁抗震研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(51508223)

Study on the application of viscous dampers and steel dampers to bridge transverse vibration control

ZHENG Yifeng QIAN Shengyu    

  1. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun130012, Jilin, China
  • Received:2020-12-02 Revised:2021-05-25 Online:2021-12-25 Published:2021-12-01
  • Contact: 郑一峰(1966-),男,教授,主要从事桥梁抗震研究。 E-mail:zhengyf0824@126.com
  • About author:郑一峰(1966-),男,教授,主要从事桥梁抗震研究。
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51508223)

摘要: 在桥梁结构横桥向地震控制中,粘滞阻尼器和钢阻尼器是可靠度较高的地震控制装置,二者已在多座桥梁工程中得到了初步应用。文中从工作原理、构造实现形式、力学行为、减震效果等方面对这两种阻尼装置进行了对比研究。其中:对比力学行为时,对粘滞阻尼器开展了不同速度下的力学性能试验,并与现有文献中钢阻尼器力学行为进行比较;对比二者减震效果时,以一座三塔斜拉桥为例,讨论了28条地震波激励下,两种装置本身及桥梁结构的响应差异并以其中一条地震波为例,从能量的角度分析了造成这种现象的原因。结果表明:由于阻尼装置的耗能机制不同,导致不同阻尼装置的动力响应不同,但桥梁结构的地震响应未发生明显变化;Ⅰ类场地条件下,在过渡墩与辅助墩处,粘滞阻尼器对桥梁横桥向地震动控制的效果优于钢阻尼器。 

关键词:

桥梁工程, 横桥向地震动控制, 粘滞阻尼器, 钢阻尼器

Abstract: In the seismic control of bridge structures in the transverse bridge direction, viscous dampers and steel dampers are seismic control devices with high reliability, and both have been initially applied in several bridge projects. In this paper, a comparative study of the two types of damping devices was carried out in terms of their ope-rating principles, constructional realization form, mechanical behaviour and seismic damping effects. The mechanical behaviour of the viscous dampers was compared with that of the steel dampers in the literature. As to their seismic damping effects, the difference in response between the two devices and the bridge structure under the excitation of 28 seismic waves was discussed by taking a three-tower cable-stayed bridge as the example. Based on one of the 28 seismic waves, the causes of this phenomenon was analyzed from the perspective of energy. The results show that the different damping devices have different energy dissipation mechanisms, resulting in different dynamic responses, but the seismic response shows no significant change; the viscous dampers are more effective than the steel dampers in controlling the bridge cross-bridge ground vibration at the transition and auxiliary piers under Class I site conditions. 

Key words:

bridge engineering, cross-bridge ground vibration control, viscous damper, steel damper

中图分类号: