华南理工大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 106-112.doi: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.180307

• 交通运输工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于 D- S 证据法的路面行车舒适性综合评价方法

张金喜 周同举 王琳 吴洋    

  1. 北京工业大学 交通工程北京市重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-15 修回日期:2018-09-30 出版日期:2019-02-25 发布日期:2019-01-02
  • 通信作者: 张金喜( 1965) ,男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事道路工程、道路与交通安全研究. E-mail:zhangjinxi@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张金喜( 1965) ,男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事道路工程、道路与交通安全研究.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目( 51778027) ;2018 年度北京市交通行业科技项目( 40038003201805) 

Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Road Driving Comfort Based on D-S Evidence Method
 

 ZHANG Jinxi ZHOU Tongju WANG Lin WU Yang    

  1.  Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China
  • Received:2018-06-15 Revised:2018-09-30 Online:2019-02-25 Published:2019-01-02
  • Contact: 张金喜( 1965) ,男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事道路工程、道路与交通安全研究. E-mail:zhangjinxi@bjut.edu.cn
  • About author:张金喜( 1965) ,男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事道路工程、道路与交通安全研究.
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China( 51778027) 

摘要: 路面行车舒适性主要受路面平整度的影响,目前主要有主观感受、行车振动以及 驾乘人员的心生理变化3 种评价方法. 由于测试对象、测试方法及评价标准不同,不同方 法对路面行车舒适性评价的准确性不同,评价结果也有一定的差异. 为了提升路面行车舒 适性评价的准确性和客观性,文中利用平整度范围为1. 06 ~5. 53m/km 的12 条沥青路面 的室外乘车试验结果,提出了采用 D-S( Dempster-Shafer) 证据法对3 种评价方法进行决策 融合的路面行车舒适性综合评价方法. 研究结果表明:采用 D-S 证据法建立的基于路面平 整度的行车舒适性综合评价体系能够显著降低各评价方法的不确定性,验证了模型的有 效性,得到了综合3 种舒适性评价方法的路面平整度绝对阈值;速度对综合评价体系的不 确定性下降比例有重要的影响,符合实际情况. 

关键词: 国际平整度指标, 行车舒适性, D-S 证据理论, 决策融合, 综合评价方法 

Abstract:  Road driving comfort is mainly affected by the pavement roughness. At present, there are three evaluation methods: subjective feeling,driving vibration and heart physiological changes of drivers and passengers. Due to different test objects,test methods and evaluation criteria,the accuracies of different methods for road driving comfort evaluation are different,and the evaluation results are also different. In order to improve the accuracy and objectivity of road driving comfort evaluation,a comprehensive evaluation method for road driving comfort using D-S ( Dempster-Shafer) evidence method for decision-making fusion of three evaluation methods was proposed to test the outdoor riding test results of 12 asphalt pavements with roughness changing from 1. 06 ~5. 53m/km. The research results show that the comprehensive evaluation system of driving comfort based on road roughness established by D-S evidence method can significantly reduce the uncertainty of each evaluation method,verify the validity of the model,and obtain the absolute threshold of road roughness with 3 kinds of comfort evaluation methods; the speed has an important influence on the proportion of uncertainty in the comprehensive evaluation system,which is in line with the actual situation. 

Key words:  IRI ( international roughness index), driving comfort, D-S evidence theory, decision fusion, comprehensive evaluation method

中图分类号: